• Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because our dishwashers are massively more efficient and environmentally friendly.

      They use very little water, which they heat up themselves to save energy

      The only drawback is they take longer to clean the dishes, up to three hours

      But nobody would be so selfish as to demand their dishes be done quickly over preserving our environment, would they?

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why would that save energy? It’s going to be resistive heat, which at best matches the water heater. Some models in the US include a heating element, but it’s more of a convenience. The vast majority are simply connected to the hot water line, since that’s why it’s there.

        Also, let’s talk numbers. From what I could Google, EU dishwashers use 1-1.5KWh/load, while US dishwashers use an average of 1.15KWh/load. Certainly there are more efficient models, but this shows that there isn’t a significant difference in energy usage between them.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          your energy calculations are forgetting the energy cost of the pre-heated water, it’s the appliance equivalent of an offshore tax haven!

        • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Your system - Add cold water to water heater and heat (using energy). Keep at required heat until needed, could be a whole day or more (using energy). Pump hot water through cold pipes to dishwasher, losing energy. Reheat (using energy)

          Our system - add cold water to device directly. Heat (using energy)

          I couldn’t explain it any clearer so I’ll fuck off now

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Your criticism is accurate in terms of thermodynamic efficiency, where we have to account for all energy entering and leaving the system.

            But we are talking about economic efficiency, where we only count the energy passing through the wires. In the context of a thread on heat pump water heaters, the distinction is important: heat pumps use a small amount of electrical energy to scavenge a large amount of thermal energy from the environment. Thermodynamically, we have to count that energy; economically, that energy is “free” for the taking.

            I have never heard of a “heat pump dishwasher”; the dishwasher is using a resistive heat source, and not the “free” energy from the environment.

            When you understand why heat pumps are commonly 200% to 300% economically efficient (without breaking the laws of thermodynamics or becoming perpetual motion machines), you will understand why heating cold water in a dishwasher can be less efficient than heating it in a water heater.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m confused, our as in European dishwashers are more efficient and environmentally friendly?

        But wouldn’t it be even more so if the hot water that was stored and not being used was the feed instead of cold water? That was the temperature increase is minimal and a lot more efficient.

        The eco wash is the best wash on my dishwasher.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It has nothing to do with energy efficiency, and everything to do with UK plumbing. A building’s hot water system is presumed to be subject to environmental contamination, and not considered potable. Only the cold water supply is considered potable.

          It’s the same reason why they have separate taps for hot and cold water, while the US uses mixing taps almost everywhere.

        • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          The majority of our hot water is on-demand so no. Also, is it more efficient to heat the water, pump it through a potentially cold pipe, only to have to reheat it again? Nope,just heat it where you need it, and with a lower wattage heater

            • orrk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              everyone, ever. unless you are running some industrial operations that require constant hot water, there is no reason for even a large family to be using water continuously, and hot at that

          • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Heating a volume of water a given number of degrees takes the same amount of energy regardless. Using a lower wattage heater is just going to make it take longer, not save any power.

            • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Edit to explain in detail -

              Your system - Add cold water to water heater and heat (using energy). Keep at required heat until needed, could be a whole day or more (using energy). Pump hot water through cold pipes to dishwasher, losing energy. Reheat (using energy)

              Our system - add cold water to device directly. Heat (using energy)

              No idea how Americans can’t understand that most of the developed world is decades ahead of them environmentally 😂

              • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I understand the difference, I was pointing out the wattage thing doesn’t really make sense.

              • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Using gas to heat water is considerably cheaper than using resistive electric. Especially when the electric was historically provided by coal or gas anyway.

                Burning gas to heat water into steam to turn a turbine to turn a generator to pump electricity to a resistive element inside a dishwasher is not nearly as efficient as just burning the gas inside a water heater and sending it to the dishwasher. The heat losses incurred while passing the water from a gas heater to the dishwasher are a tiny fraction of the losses incurred in the convoluted processes involved in traditional electrical generation.

      • theragu40@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m so confused. Whose dishwashers are you talking about? I’m in the US, you’re describing every dishwasher I’ve ever had, except that we always hook it up to the hot water line. Our unit takes very little water, it takes hours to run a load due to efficiency features. It has a heating element inside to take whatever water it gets and keep it hot for the cycle.

        I don’t really see why it’s any less efficient to use the hot water we are already heating with our water heater (which heats much more efficiently than a small electric heater would). The water originally arrives to my house cold, it has to be heated one way or another. My dishwasher is less than 10 feet away from my water heater, water is not losing appreciable heat on the way to the dishwasher.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No.

        The reason your dishwashers use cold water is because your hot water supply is not presumed to be potable water.

        EU regulations allows for gravity-fed hot water tanks in certain jurisdictions, open to atmospheric pressure, and thus possible contamination. They did this to prevent the possibility of exploding boilers.

        Since the building’s hot water supply is presumed unsafe, dishwashers are required to use the safe, cold water supply to generate their own safe, hot water.

        US regulations do not allow hot water to be held at atmospheric pressure. We use T&P valves to limit boiler pressures and prevent explosions. Our hot water is not exposed to environmental contaminants, and is presumed potable.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It depends. Spraying your dishes with water that is prone to legionella doesn’t seem super safe to me. But even assuming that, I have dishwasher programs than run at 70C, which is above what my hot water tank produces.

      Besides, isn’t there a heating element in a US dishwasher regardless? Otherwise, it feels like it has got to continually add more hot water to keep the temperature up…

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It depends. Spraying your dishes with water that is prone to legionella doesn’t seem super safe to me.

        That is the real reason why UK / EU dishwashers use the cold water supply. They don’t consider a building’s hot water supply to be potable water. Their hot water was once held in atmospheric pressure, gravity-fed tanks, exposed to environmental contamination. Brits treated central hot water as unclean. This is also why they often used separate taps for hot and cold water. If they need clean, hot water, they heat cold water at the point of use.

        The US never allowed atmospheric pressure hot water tanks. Our hot water is not exposed to environmental contaminants, and is presumed potable.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As a Dane living in the U.K., I agree. I’d never seen an atmospheric pressure water system growing up but coming here, that seemed the norm. Now, 20 years after, the norm in U.K. new installation is high pressure water systems (so called “system boilers”) so it is changing slowly. But in the U.K. they have an almost mortal fear for high pressure systems, thinking they’ll explode at any moment.

    • Taringano@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe it’s mostly due to not having always hot water hookups available where laundry would be or not consistently having hot water always available. (as in on demand, from a large boiler that wouldn’t impact the remain of the hot water uses)

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes in many places, hot water is produced on demand in smaller residences. This means your dishwasher relying on hot water would kill your shower.

        I know this seems odd probably to Americans … but many houses in the U.K. doesn’t have the space for a hot water tank.

        • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m intrigued- does that mean the UK uses “tankless” water heaters, at least in smaller residences? Are they underspecced that they can’t handle a shower at the same time as a (typically) 3.5 gallon dishwasher?

          • ThatBaldFella@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Speaking for The Netherlands here, but I believe our situation is very similar to the UK in this regard. A lot of houses are equipped with a gas-powered tankless heater which supplies both central heating and hot water. These come in various sizes and output capacities, so you can install one which comfortably suits your needs. Using hot water for multiple things at once shouldn’t be an issue if you have the right heater installed.

            • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Same in the U.K. Although my experience is that you’ll have to have a gas boiler with some buffer (40L say) to not experience a pressure drop of hot water when somebody else washes their hands. It doesn’t matter how often I’ve heard a plumber say “you won’t feel the pressure drop with this bad boy installed”; you always feel it.

          • Liquid_Fire@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            In the UK your dishwasher is typically connected only to the cold water intake, so that’s not a problem unless you have multiple showers in your house… that said, water heaters are often limited to either heating or hot water (not both at the same time), but that’s not an issue in practice since you’re not going to be using the hot water for long periods of time.