psychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoApple Vision Pro Owners Are Struggling to Figure Out What They Just Boughtnymag.comexternal-linkmessage-square279fedilinkarrow-up1634arrow-down139cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1595arrow-down1external-linkApple Vision Pro Owners Are Struggling to Figure Out What They Just Boughtnymag.compsychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square279fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squaredouble_oh_walter@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·2 years agoTwo dingi don’t make a right. Or something.
minus-squarevexikron@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·2 years agoDingi. Pronounced ding eye? Dingii? Ding gee eye? My brain hurts now.
minus-squarevexikron@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoBut thats just a single dinghy. If you pluralize that its either dinghies or dingii? Meh, my autistic brain gets stuck on weird stupid shit like this. Its like… If you have a donut, then a second donut, you have two donuts. You can say two donut to be cutesy i guess? Very hard for me to tell when being cutesy is appropriate.
minus-squarevexikron@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoIf the root singular word is dingus, this makes sense. If the root singular word is dinghy, as I guess I have always said, then it does not. Well at least I partially understand my own confusion now, thanks!
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·2 years agoDon’t they cancel each other out?
minus-squareGormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoUnfortunately they multiply instead of cancel
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·2 years agoOne times one is still one
minus-squaretofubl@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 years agoi times i is -1, though. Imagine that!
minus-squaredouble_oh_walter@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoHmm. They might. Hadn’t thought of that. This requires more research. You must buy one - for science! And, I guess, for “science “.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-22 years agoNo, if you touch two dingii together you still have two dingii. Two sexy, sexy dingii
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down7·2 years agoNow the singular is “dingius?”
Two dingi don’t make a right. Or something.
Dingi.
Pronounced ding eye? Dingii? Ding gee eye?
My brain hurts now.
It rhymes with dinghy.
But thats just a single dinghy.
If you pluralize that its either dinghies or dingii?
Meh, my autistic brain gets stuck on weird stupid shit like this.
Its like… If you have a donut, then a second donut, you have two donuts.
You can say two donut to be cutesy i guess?
Very hard for me to tell when being cutesy is appropriate.
One dingus, two dingi.
If the root singular word is dingus, this makes sense.
If the root singular word is dinghy, as I guess I have always said, then it does not.
Well at least I partially understand my own confusion now, thanks!
Don’t they cancel each other out?
Unfortunately they multiply instead of cancel
One times one is still one
i times i is -1, though. Imagine that!
That’s too complex for me.
Hmm. They might. Hadn’t thought of that.
This requires more research. You must buy one - for science! And, I guess, for “science “.
No, if you touch two dingii together you still have two dingii.
Two sexy, sexy dingii
Now the singular is “dingius?”