I’ve heard multiple issues with 5G, like range and stuff, effectively sacrificing range and reliability for even more speed just so that companies can market it better. Do you think 5G is a downgrade compared to 4G?

  • BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well, the 5G signal itself is better.

    It is different from 4G, so it does require reevaluating infrastructure placement.

    The same thing happened with 4G. It is weaker than 3G, but faster.

    Same thing with 5Ghz wifi. It is weaker, but faster, than 2.4Ghz.

    A motorcycle gets better gas mileage, more nimble, and less space than a car or truck. But there is a lot you can’t haul on a motorcycle.

  • deranger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t feel it’s a downgrade at all. I get nearly as good download as my home connection and significantly faster upload. Never had any issues with 5G or 5G UC. T-mobile and iPhones.

  • Some of what you may have heard about the range and such might not be about 5G phone networks but 5G wifi.

    5G phone networks are very good.

    5G(hz) wifi has more capacity and is faster, but has limited range and doesn’t penetrate walls as well as 2.4GHz

  • Extras@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I guess it really depends on your area. I hear stories that it’s the bee’s knees and then other ones where the signal is so congested, especially if using a mvno. Personally I’m sticking with 4g, in my area 5g is about the same in speed unless you want to stay up til like 4am to get a decent boost.