In July, Lockheed Martin completed the build of NASA’s X-59 test aircraft, which is designed to turn sonic booms into mere thumps, in the hope of making overland supersonic flight a possibility. Ground tests and a first test flight are planned for later in the year. NASA aims to have enough data to hand over to US regulators in 2027.

    • Derproid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Flying used to be a “luxury boondoggle for the rich” same with a lot of things that we view as common today.

    • cloud@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      how about we focus on decarbonizing air travel for the commoners? Fuck supersonic flight

      No fuck you peasant, we gonna have the rich flying in supersonic flightrs and there’s nothing you can do about it

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They can do both.

      Specialization of Labor is what society is built upon, and it actually allows society to work on multiple problems all at once.

      “Engineer” is not a magical term. The people working on improving aerodynamics can’t just stop doing that and switch gears to focus on chemistry, materials, process improvements, or software.

      Complaining that these engineers aren’t fixing the pollution from air travel is like complaining that they aren’t delivering the mail, preventing shoplifting, or solving the Hollywood strikes.

    • soviettaters@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Concorde was a “luxury boondoggle for the rich” and it failed hard. Nobody wants a repeat of that which is why the new goal for supersonic travel is to become cheap and quiet.