Are there any alternatives to the Internet Archive that are built around P2P, so that everyone can contribute to hosting/sharing web archives? Seems like having all these important archives hosted by a single organization isn’t the best idea for longevity/redundancy

@opensource

  • Sem@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sounds like a potential application for a blockchain techs, that allows to do verifications, voting and consensus.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ive had similar ideas on verified unaltered media to combat fake news. Such an archive but for journalism would be a great start.

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah, quite possibly. Could still be very hard to get right. Region blocking might make consensus difficult.

      Edit: just occurred to me, any method of consensus could be used to ddos sites as well. Might be best left for people smarter than me

      • Sem@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think that proof-of-work approach to blockchain can make ddos attacks much harder, but I’m not an expert too :)

        • CameronDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I figured that every node would need to scrap the site, in order to validate the content. If there are thousands of nodes, that would ddos the site.

          I don’t really understand how PoW would solve that, can you explain?

          • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I figured that every node would need to scrap the site, in order to validate the content. If there are thousands of nodes, that would ddos the site.

            with cryptocurrencies the blockchain is distributed, its not stored centrally. your idea could work similarly

          • Sem@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think it can be done like a NFTs on top of Bitcoin. In this case evey archived page is NFT and all the blockchain is available, so there is no centralized cite. If each action will require some computations (PoW) then ddos attack or spam attack will be very hard to implement.

            • CameronDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Thats for proving its untampered with right? I’m more thinking of validating the archive copy is a “true” copy when adding it initially, which requires each node to check against the live site?

              Its definitely an intriguing idea though, but I don’t know enough to know how feasable it can be