• Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This service can be straight-up forked like a Fediverse instance. Banning the service will not hurt competition.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      The key for them is that they want the service to be provided by a US company. There are actually already a few companies hosting DeepSeek in US, and I’m sure the techniques will be incorporated by everyone in short order.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        And DeepSeek can continue to release open source models. Banning just the service happens to lower the cahnces of DeepSeek going the same way OpenAI did, as in it would be more unlikely for them to close off the models like OpenAI did if they want to continue shaking up the market.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          As I explained above the open source models aren’t the problem from the US perspective. DeepSeek will obviously continue to release models, and it will likely become the standard outside the west. However, US will not allow it become the dominant service provider in the US, and that’s why I expect the service to be banned. The US will force American companies to use a domestic provider, and Europe is likely to do the same.