• Lunyan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why pirating games that aren’t available to be bought anymore is never wrong

    • Jimbo@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, say I want an old need for speed game, either buy a disk for a high price that I can’t put in my disk drive-less PC or pirate it…

      Hmm I wonder which one I will choose

  • banana_tree@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pirating as an alternative to paying as often as one can, even when the product is on offer by Nintendo or whoever, is usually very easy. It’s the least we can all do in terms of class struggle.

    • UnverifiedAPK@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why Steam’s business mindset is to get you the game as easily as possible. If it’s easier to buy than to not most people will buy it.

    • pazukaza@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would be pretty nice. But companies usually protect their IP, so they won’t go around showing how they code their games.

      If they open source it isn’t it easier for other companies to release clones? Not identical but inspired on their code. At a lower cost because the engineering challenges of coding the game are already taught in there.

      • Bloody Harry@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        not sure if the programming and engineering problems of a game released 20 yeasr ago have too much relevance today

        • pazukaza@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah ok, 20 years seems fair. I wonder if Nintendo is concerned people would rather play old emulated games for free instead of buying new (expensive) games.

          Or are they planning to monetize these old games at some point? Imagine if they provided a monthly subscription to a library of emulated games for Switch. Playstation does this in the Premium subscription layer.

          Anyways, if they are going after people emulating 20yo games, that’s pretty unreasonable. That’s some penny-grabbing shit right there. How much people actually emulate games anyways? How much people want to play 20yo games anyways? I can’t imagine that being any kind of threat to their income.