Linked National Post on purpose. Given their bias I believe they’d present the worst case scenario.

E: Apparently the article is from 2016 so the cost is likely higher today.

  • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    Ford blew twice that to put beer in gas stations. Clearly we have the money to blow 🤡

  • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    21 minutes ago

    Why bother paying anything? Let it go to court. Threatening annexation should fall under some kind of hostilities clause, national security clause, or force majeure clause. Anyway who’s going to collect?

    The US government can pay MD Lockheed, they’re the ones who threatened annexation.

    Edit… Fixed above, not sure why I had MacDonell Douglas on my mind…strange substitution for a company that no longer exists under that name.

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 hours ago

    We need to pull out of this deal, the last thing Canada needs is to buy weapons from the country that has designs to annex us. And that sells weapons with kill switches.

      • CircaV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Exactly. Absolutely it has to be cancelled based on the fact that the imminent danger to Canada is from the US. No way we should be buying their weapons, listening to their media etc.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        That feels like an internet rumour. How would that even work? Like if someone took out LM’s servers all F-35s in the world would no longer function? If an enemy jammed the signal they wouldn’t work?

        There’s no need to invent problems anyway. The US could potentially cut off Canada from parts needed to maintain the planes and that’s reason enough to cancel it.

  • Global_Liberty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Of course Canada needs to leave. Do Canadian politicians think the US will supply it with parts as it invades?

    Buy some Gripen and/or Eurofighters and join GCAP.

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 hours ago

    That’s less than the total incurred costs of Ford’s decision to break the contract with The Beer Store a year earlier than scheduled.

      • crabigno@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        And investment. 1/5 of my lifetime economies are now in European aerospace and military companies shares. Something I would have never thought I would do, as a fundamentally anti militaristic person. I don’t even care if I don’t get any economic benefits out of it.

  • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’ve been advocating joining GCAP, an effort by Japan, UK and Italy to make a 6th gen fighter. It isn’t scheduled to deliver the final design until 2035 though, so we would still need a stopgap.

    Still, it would send a pretty strong signal and also allow as a path to reinvigorate our domestic aerospace defence industry.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      This looks like a good idea. We do have people in Lunenberg, NS that have experience with working with stealth materials which could be a significant contribution to that project.

      Could we call it the Arrow? Though I’d also be cool with it being called Spitfire.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    America is currently at war with us, declared abruptly and out of nowhere. They just decided one day “we want to annex Canada!”

    Even if Donald’s presidency is short-lived and a new slightly saner and less stupid administration takes control, I don’t think it’s a good idea to be trusting the Americans any more.

    We need to disentangle ourselves from any military dependence on such ridiculously unreliable “allies.” I’m all for this.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      I think everyone is thinking the same way. I think the probability of the US invading is low, but there is a probability.

      Even if the US never uses their military against us, there’s a very real chance they withhold parts for military equipment as leverage in a negotiation. They are already withholding military aid from Ukraine as leverage after all. That alone makes it imperative we end Canada’s dependency on the US defense industry.

    • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      Even if Donald’s presidency is short-lived and a new slightly saner and less stupid administration takes control

      I know the hamburglar has got his sights on Trump but if he takes his shot during the next 4 years the US gets JD Vance. Vance will be a lot worse than Trump, I do not know how Musk or Teil will handle Vance.

    • pretzelz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You would imagine there would be a clause in the contract for exactly this scenario. If there’s not, it’s going to be a common one in contacts going forward…

    • PenguinMage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      As an American I sadly agree. This is an overreach that shouldn’t be ignored. And if it is OK now it’s obviously not off the table sometime down the road… this isnt something g you just shove under the carpet.

    • CircaV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Exactly. Canada should just choose to ignore it. Just like the US is ignoring international deals they’ve signed with other countries. Thing is: Canada has honour and our actual signature means something when we sign agreements. I don’t think Canada will sink as low as the US.

    • Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      When the creditor calls tell them Canada doesn’t live here anymore and hang up like your room mate used to do for you in college.

    • Yoga@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      “Canada’s liability would be no greater than US$346.7 million” – the difference between what it had already contributed and what was remaining of the original US$551 million commitment.

      Since the analysis was produced, the Liberal government has paid another US$33 million.

      Considering that there are Canadian companies that have contracts related to the f35 and they would almost certainly be cancelled or not renewed, running down the clock isn’t a terrible idea. The $300+m is already a sunk cost.

    • chuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      No say will cancel it and then pause it then cancel the landing gear then pause that then cancel it pause it till it comes back looking like the avro arrow

  • Yoga@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    18 hours ago

    https://www.saab.com/markets/canada/gripen-for-canada/built-for-canada-by-canada

    From another page:

    “In addition, Canada will have full and exclusive control over Gripen’s secure data – a unique advantage of our offer. The Gripen Centre in Montreal will host all work on the fighter’s mission system and Canadians will carry out this work. With the mission system, communications and technical data all hosted in Canada, Gripen exceeds all industrial, security and controlled goods requirements. With Gripen the Royal Canadian Air Force will have maximum control over sensitive data handling.”

    It’s a no brainer, in a world of digital warfare, needing to rely on a foreign home base is a tremendous liability.

  • Aconite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Fuck it. They’re an intelligence hazard and that’s cheap in government terms.