That’s because water is necessary to life.

When doing risk analysis something that is required to keep people alive gets a few extra points towards being accessible for, hopefully, obvious reasons.

If even something that is necessary for life is controlled due to the danger it poses, you can imagine why people would seek to restrict dangerous things that people can live without.

So what, no one would be allowed to teach others about their religion?

That’s a level of control i don’t think any organisation or government should have.

Banning religion full stop is wrong and won’t stop belief.

However, religion should not have any special protections that other groups do not get.

Religion should not exclude people from mandatory childhood vaccines, religion should not be a mitigating factor in vilification or defamation cases etc.

Yes, and that’s why we don’t allow people to flood school, hospitals and homes with water. It is controlled and diverted.

Because religion can be and has been used to convince people to do terrible things. The fewer false beliefs people hold the fewer things can be used to manipulate them in this way.

Thanks bro. lgtm.

It is, as padStart, which makes the number of packages using leftpad even more incomprehensible