The entire article is just an ad for a blog that doesn’t exist yet… The irony is unbearable.

It says that’s what he did in the first sentence of the article…

Asking users to Opt out as a method to replace an Opt in TOS is a trick because they are hoping users won’t see it. If they sent an email asking users to click a link to Opt in to the new TOS, that would be OK.

I hate it when people act dumb like this. You know why it’s an issue because of the opt out instead of the normal opt in.

If the tech caused the crash, then absolutely yes