But sir, the profits

Cable hell

Is this dead Internet theory?

Sure haha 😁 uninviting but cozy

Looks very inviting

That doesn’t negate anything

it’s just a trillion dollar company, I think you have to take that into account. They obviously don’t have enough resources to release excellent products.

(/s)

Ban all imagery

I don’t think it’s gotten better, and honestly they oversimplify even more today. For some reason

They stop reactors all the time. It’ll probably be cheaper to get a massive battery pack+solar

My brother in Carl XVI Gustaf think twice, no one thinks you’re hard nor funny.

You do yourself a disservice by continuing to hide insecurities by pushing others down.

Now you’re projecting

How do you mean I was bragging?

I wonder why you are so insecure that you feel you must try to insult everyone in every sentence.

Do you mean approximating? Could just round it up so it’s divisible by ten and remove the excess but it’s not the answer. Calculating the limits I.e 164*1,6 took more time.

Besides, I can’t fathom why everyone should have to convert everything by themselves, this would be the effect of the suggestion. It would be the absolute most needless, time wasting, and unnecessary effort society could do.

[citation needed]?

Removed by mod

What are you on about? If anyone is interested, read my comment history

Edit: if we store the shitty pictures on blockchain, literally nothing changes, except a big and bulky blockchain. “I can just save the picture lmao” will still be the answer… Are we supposed to store every software on blockchain too? I don’t think it’s viable

This article too is flawed

I don’t think people thought about it too much. But it shouldn’t be allowed, even if it’s a joke

Maybe a size adjuster is needed

Removed by mod

I didn’t, the premise that anyone can copy the blockchain and gain access to the assets is flawed. You’ll have to look up the Immutable X implementation, it was too long since I read about it, if you’re curious. Like I don’t think there will ever be a digital version of ownership that isn’t “a url” since, well it’s digital. The url and wallet is connected to the thing blabla

But you don’t own your things. Steam even restricted my access to my things because I hadn’t bought anything from their store in an arbitrary amount of time, I bought from other places and entered the cd key. The “web2” way of centralisation is also flawed.

Is it the one and true only answer, I don’t know, probably not in its current form albeit it is functional (immutable X). But the arguments against NFTs are mostly against these ducking pictures that ruined any possibility of working towards a goal where we as consumers could get more value.

Edit: appeal to ridicule is also a fallacy