Easier to focus on a few, very public individuals.
Easier to focus on a few, very public individuals.
Billionaires are a problem, but not the problem. Weath Inequality inherent in the economic system is the real enemy. Billionaires are only a symptom and a lightning rod.
You are not thinking cumulatively.
It’s not even close to triple, it’s like 15%.
1.15^7=2.66
From the article
“emit 2.5 billion tons by 2030, which is three times higher than the predictions if generative AI had not come into play.”
Waterwheels. Thousands of years old but still an essential part of our energy system.
Hendrix springs to mind
Yes. A professional is much better than ransom lemmy advice.
Your therapist should help you realise that the worse case scenario (rejection) has already happened to you many times in other forms, and you survived.
After 30 you should both be able to handle rejection and reject in a nice way. Just make sure you are both sober and sprinkle lots of compliments.
Richard Cranium sounds like a very, very posh cat.
Pluto is a dwarf plant. They take part in the planetary paralympic games.
Belters, belters, belters.
I think the book has to be read before watching the movie.
feet, knees, dick and hips, dick and hips
feet, knees, dick and hips, dick and hips
And eyes and ears and mouth and nose.
feet, knees, dick and hips, dick and hips
Thank you. I couldn’t see the problem.
And if this layout is auto generated, maybe I still don’t see the problem.
Brewsters millions would be so easy in 2024. Just train some AI.
there should be a mockumentary of him where he’s played by Steve Carell.
There’s one with Charlie Chaplin
Yes, much better than 3-30 passwords.
But I view SSO as enterprise password manager with a nice UI. I don’t trust it for anything super important.
JK Rowling should be a billionaire, but she keeps giving money away.