Yeah, I was getting the names mixed up.

The pokemon leak. I think it was originally uploaded to this website.

Is it because of the leak?

NGL sounds like a solid plan to me.

Polynomial subscripts sound awesome, ngl. Never seen it before; I want to know what the applications are.

What’s wrong with making a recursive function in a recursive function with variables M, m, N, n? It’s perfectly fine when I’m writing infinite series.

My understanding is that’s the case with kidneys as well. If there’s enough room, they don’t bother removing the old organ because that just introduces more chances to make a mistake.

Something interesting about the liver is that we can regrow it. So it might be possible to take a portion of a liver, put it in another person, and then both those pieces grow into a full or well-enough-functioning liver. I’m not a physician and I don’t know if such a procedure has ever been attempted.

Pollywag is a Gen 1 pokemon. All of those are fairly common words.

Tnf, this is the kind of answer a person might give if you asked them the question randomly.

I’m mad that Fl*rida is hanging out of the shorts. 🤮

Cover that shit up.

So the real Hell’s in your chest! (You have heartburn.)

How the fuck?!

Why do you even want those things?

I’m a mathematician. 88 is a number. You think letting them have an entire number isn’t damaging?

I believe that’s correct, yes.

Degenerate, 88, 14, the Roman salute, multiple names, the fascista, shaven heads, lighting motifs, runic symbols.

That’s just what I came up with off the top of my head. The other person is right, and I say we should reclaim every symbol because those fuckers shouldn’t be allowed to call anything their own or have anything to ralley around or identify each other with. The only symbol I’m aware of that the made was the black sun which is itself simply the ss symbol repeated around a circle, which itself is an appropriated rune.

Reclaim every symbol.

If biohacking has gone from a counter-culture of DIY implants to trendy health gimmicks for profit, that’s really upsetting to me.

It’s a good video (I’ve seen it; very informative and accessible cannot recommend enough), but I think you each mean different things when you use the word “intelligence”.

That isn’t a paradox; it’s an infohazard, and it’s incredibly irresponsible of you to casually propagate it like that. The info hazard works like this: >!There is a story about an AI that tortures simulations of people who interfered with their creation in the past. It allegedly does this because this will coerce people into bringing about its creation. It is said that the infohazard is that learning about it causes you to be tortured, but that’s obviously insane; the future actions of the AI are incapable of affecting the past, and so it has no insensitive to do so. The actual infohazard is that some idiot will find this scenario plausible, and thus be coerced into creating or assisting an untested near-god that has the potential to be a threat to Earth’s entire light-cone.!<

Some people note this is remarkably similar to the Christian Hell, and insist that means it’s not a real memetic hazard. This strikes me as a whole lot like saying that a missile isn’t a weapon because it’s similar to a nuclear warhead; Hell is the most successful and devastating memetic hazard in human history. More people have died because of the Hell meme than we will ever know. Please be more careful with the information you spread.

The sword would pass through and the shield would either be unaffected or immediately reconstitute itself.

The hypothetical does not necessarily assume that the wearer of the shield would be protected.