Philip K. Dick’s early novella The Gun describes this, but instead of chat bots, they were auto nuclear weapons.
Philip K. Dick’s early novella The Gun describes this, but instead of chat bots, they were auto nuclear weapons.
Sean k strikes it again.
Maybe I’m missing something, but shouldn’t the benchmark be a good approximation to the real workload? I don’t see how the measurements reflect the performance difference in real life usages.
Why would I need 100MiB/s processing as opposed to 20MiB/s processing, when I can only read maybe several lines per second?
Yes for OCaml. Haskell’s inequality is defined as /=
(for ≠). <>
is usually the Monoid mappend
operator (i.e. generalized binary concatenation).
After the crush, they shout CR2032.
It’s not that the author picked Rust for scripting. All Rust game engines (e.g. Bevy) use Rust as the scripting language.
Compare this with Godot, which is implemented in C++, but supports GDScript and many other languages for scripting.
Also, only supporting Rust is not considered a limitation, but a feature here. Bevy’s ECS is tied up with Rust’s trait system, therefore it’s impossible to use a different language.
So if Rust as a system programming language should not be used for game scripting, then projects like Bevy are fundamentally flawed. The author is willing to go there, but I don’t know if many people would go that far.
There could be a Godot-like engine written in Rust that supports easier scripting languages, but I think that space is not explored due to the fact that Godot already exists.
Nah, in real CSS, the window would overflow and bring down the whole house.
If you execute a binary without specifying the path to it, it will be searched from the $PATH environment variable, which is a list of places to look for the binary. From left to right, the first found one is returned.
You can use which cat
to see what it resolves to and whereis cat
to get all possible results.
If you intentionally wants to use a different binary with the same name, you can either directly use its path, or prepend its path to $PATH.
Reminds me of the character White Rose from Mr. Robot. Here’s the introduction scene.
Sadly not its meta factory.
It’s not presented as a loop and there’s no wife panel after the fourth one 🤔
As other comments point out, they are usually not properly packaged through nix.
If you read the vim/plugins
modules, for most plugins, the derivation just downloads the plugin, puts it to nix-store
, and makes it available to the editor through environment variables. So it’s similar to the binary distributed software. Two most notable restrictions:
nix-store
model.So for plugins that don’t have external dependencies (or dependencies other than the “common” ones like python or sh that happen to be available), and that don’t interact with the filesystems, this approach would be fine, but the more complex ones would fail.
In your example, mason
failed because of 1, home-manager wasn’t aware that the pip
module is a transient dependency of this plugin; and treesitter
failed because of 2, because it doesn’t know that nix-store
is read-only and should be managed by nix
.
There are no general solutions, but people may have nixified some plugins on a case-by-case basis. If you don’t want to spend a lot of time (and remember that it might be broken by the next plugin upgrade), as others have suggested, take the traditional plugin management approach. (Personally, I use LunarVim which uses Lazy.nvim
and it’s been working fine.)
This, but unironically used as a marketing trick:
There was no v1 of Oracle Database, as co-founder Larry Ellison “knew no one would want to buy version 1”
That’s why the first Oracle database is v2.
NERV is a private service, which rebroadcasts government emergency warnings with better representations.
The high price is a result of monopolistic exclusivity.
The difference is that fixed capital matters little to the rate of profit, so they can spend a lot of money and it still evens out over the period of operation. The food and wage, on the other hand, affects the rate of profit a lot. So we can usually see restaurants with “fancy” decors, but with shitty food and low wages.
Why are they even on the same bus?
Well, that already happened for Reagan and Arnold Schwarzenegger.