• 1 Post
  • 30 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2025

help-circle

  • For all I know, Nostr is a kind of social network with distributed identity.

    The problem with publishing elsewhere is not that it’s hard or can’t give you reach.

    It’s the scientific metrics dictating your readership, job prospects and essentially your entire scientific career. Not only your ratings are affected, but also ones of your institution, so you have to play by the rules to have a job.

    For your publication to count, it needs to be published in journals listed in certain international indexes such as Scopus and Web of Science. These indexes are, in turn, corporate-owned (by Elsevier and Clarivate, respectively) and the respective boards are free to reject (and certainly will reject) your independent publishing source.


  • As a scientist, we desperately need it. Corporate ownership of publishing platforms is driving science down extremely badly, while exploiting all parties besides themselves.

    Many folks at our institution, including myself, simply cannot afford to publish high-rank open-access articles, and with paid articles, our reach will be minimized, especially now that Sci-Hub does not automatically scrape articles after 2021.

    The latter also strikes the other way, as many recent articles are simply unavailable if your institution is not shilling millions to subscribe to all possible publishers. So often a seemingly great article addressing exactly the specific part required is behind a paywall by the unavailable publisher.

    Finally, plenty of older articles are lost to time and cannot be found because the hosting platforms have gone down and pirates didn’t step in timely.

    All in all, fuck publishers and let’s go fix that shit ASAP. Science is absolutely destroyed by greed nowadays.








  • Pika@rekabu.rutoLinux@lemmy.mlDad uses a computer in 2025
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Aside from all controversy around snaps and stuff, which newbies don’t have to get into, there’s GNOME coming as default.

    Desktop environments essentially define how the new user treats the system and Linux as a whole. And I believe GNOME is a terrible starting point, at least for those coming from Windows.

    It follows entirely different logic, is very different visually, and overall, adds a lot of extra confusion.

    IMO, for a smooth transition, you’d rather offer something based on KDE or at least Cinnamon. Kubuntu will do fine, but it has to be mentioned specifically. Mint will be nice. And then as they explore, they’ll find what fits them best.




  • For a boring stop, I ended up on OpenSUSE Tumbleweed.

    It’s not too boring, and at the same time, once you set it up, it just works and does what you ask it to.

    It’s also very drama-free, not taking radical and controversial steps and not breaking someone’s workflow.

    In case something got broken anyways, rollback functionality is set up nicely out of the box on btrfs systems, and snapshots are automatically taken before any updates.

    This rollback functionality, along with extensive automated testing of all packages in the official repos, also makes it pretty much the only stress-free rolling release experience.





  • Absolutely. Americans, Israeli, Russians are all regular people caught in the crossfire. There are some shitheads in support of their governments, and there are plenty more of those who reject it and will happily join the opposing forces, uniting internationally over the same goal.

    And outside of political lens, people are still the same as they were a year or two or three ago. It’s just that different political circumstances highlight particular kinds of people.



  • Yes, as in “women deserve equal rights across the board”

    No, as in “feminism is the synonym to and only valid kind of antisexism and every gendered issue should be seen exclusively through women’s struggle”

    I’m here for the equality of men and women, and believe that only in cooperation, through consideration of issues on each side, we can efficiently combat sexism.

    Feminism should not be “us vs them”. It should be one part of the larger circle that is looking at how we can improve things for everyone - women, men, and nonbinary people.

    We should bridge the gap on all sides, so that whatever gender you are, you have equal possibilities in life, career, and everything else, you are safe and can build your life the way you want.

    That means no one should be targeted by sexual harassment and exploitation. No one should be denied jobs or have lower salary based on arbitrary characteristics. No one should be forced to choose a binary gender if they’re neither. Kids should not be indoctrinated with traditional gender roles. Etc. etc.

    And, honestly, I don’t think many will disagree here. Many of those who “do not support feminism” don’t mean they go against equality - they are rather concerned about a specific form of particularly loud online feminism pretending men are all evil and that there’s no related struggle on men’s end.