*Cries in vector

Yep, and MAID is particularly useful in situations where one is physically unable to off themselves. Wanting someone who doesn’t want to be around to remain trapped in that state is extremely cruel.

I think quadriplegic people should be able to end their life if they so choose. This shouldn’t be a controversial opinion at all.

And it was always clearly stated as such. It’s absurd that anyone was upset by this. I have yet to find a single user on here who did not properly understand what it was for, or at least none willing admit to being that dumb.

What makes you think it was flagged for a large tip specifically, rather than just an unusually high transaction?

It still confused me how they would know it was a $20 steak and $80 tip versus 5x $20 steaks and no tip. It would appear the same, a $100 transaction at Bob’s Steakhouse.

Wouldn’t they just see the total?

Eventually people will say that about the current options lol.

There should be no default percent options at all. None.

‘complete transaction’ or ‘add optional tip’.

deleted by creator

Removed by mod

Which bill? There was no bill.

When did it even come to a vote? My understanding is they just glossed over entirely.

I’m leaning towards NDP over the others, but depends what they promise closer to the election.

All I’m saying is the Libs will never gain my vote for election reform. They may win my vote in other ways, but not that way.

I’m going to try voting for a party that says they will end first past the post voting, if there are any. Except the party that already have made that promise and not delivered. Fool me twice and all that.

Hard to call them stupid when they got to use it for free within the return window. Seems like a good deal. I agree with all the other points though.

Just ordered one. I had no real interest, but once you tell me I can’t have one…I must have one.

If Google specifically denied tracking that’s definitely misleading, but I’m unable to find a source for it and don’t recall it myself.

Saying that the sites you visit track you would absolutely lead me to believe that search engines sites are included. Since it would not be possible to provide results for the search without knowing what was searched for by the user. And where would they send those results to without knowing the users IP or other form of network address? It just doesn’t make any sense to think a search engine would not know who searched for what, since it is required for them to function.

I always saw Google as a website too. So if I type ‘giant donkey dicks’ into the url/search bar, then Google is obviously going to know my preference for large donkey dicks. Since I googled it.

Or are these hypothetical common folk typing in full urls themselves or something? If it’s auto-filling in any way, that’s thanks to Google and they can only provide it if aware what has been typed so far.

Yep, I never switched from torrents as I never found anything more convenient.

Aww man I thought I found one! Guess I’m back down to zero people.

I don’t understand paying for streaming media at all… but I’m from the before times.

So do you feel the naming was inherently misleading which led you astray? Because incognito mode absolutely kept things ‘sneaky’ in terms of hiding the things I look up from other people who use the same computer. Which is specifically what Google said it would do and showed examples of in TV commercials. And it definitely did (and still does) that.

I’m also struggling to understand what you feel you ‘trusted’ Google on exactly. What did they tell you that you believed but, as it turns out, was not true?