Building an open source project is not just a technical challenge. It’s a social one as well, and politics are a big factor in that.
Building an open source project is not just a technical challenge. It’s a social one as well, and politics are a big factor in that.
That would work if the only problem they wanted to solve was an outdated tech stack for X. But there are other problems that wayland addresses too, like: how to scale multiple monitors nicely, is it a good idea to give all other apps the keystrokes that you do in the one in focus (and probably a lot more)
Even paid it might be hard to find maintainers with knowledge of the code
As a Homebrew maintainer, what is there to red flag about a project providing tarballs of their source?
We would have to red flag pretty much every project that uses autoconf (since those usually provide a tarball where the user doesn’t have to run autoreconf
)
Homebrew rolled back the release after finding out
Couple of years since I switched and I rarely run into any issues with my all-AMD build
Probably more directly referencing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptfmAY6M6aA
Nextcloud actually has an RSS reader app
You won’t talk your way out of that one
Tesla may have won out on this test because its Pepsi drivers were more focused on long-distance distribution, while other manufacturers represented were making more frequent regional stops. For example, the longest mileage day for the Tesla Semi incorporated just five stops, while the Nikola made 13 deliveries and one of the eCascadias did 10.
That’s a pretty big caveat to put halfway through the article.
Linux is a big part of it, but not all of Linux. Linux also isn’t part of the GNU project that the OP talks about.
Tesla is publicly traded and as far as I can tell Starlink is not a company but rather a SpaceX project.
Isn’t Gentoo the one for that title?
It’s not, they’re not open sourcing their driver. They’ve made an open source driver.