Like, I wish the Jews/Joe Biden/Democrats were as competent and cool as right-wing fearmongers make them sound.
Like, I wish the Jews/Joe Biden/Democrats were as competent and cool as right-wing fearmongers make them sound.
The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.
There is no indication that the vending machine is inappropriatly storing or transmitting personally identifiable information or that its making decisions based on biased data.
And until the machine malfunctioned, there was no indication that the vending machine was collecting any data at all. Businesses can say whatever they want in the court of public opinion, but until these same claims are made in a court of law they should be considered lies to placate the public.
Furthermore, why even collect such data if it’s not meant to be utilized? They already know what the most popular products are (since they know what they restock the most) so for what reason do they need to collect demographics?
if you need any more reason to skip it
Nah, “Substack” was enough for me.
Not gonna lie, Gandhi would be pretty low on my list of “people I’d expect to nuke the world.”
Not just because he’s a nonviolent Hindu, but also because he’s dead.
The article specifically called out “workplace communication platforms” so my comments were more directed at companies monitoring their instances of Zoom/Slack/Teams/etc. But it’s a certain bet that Walmart will try to use AI to monitor its breakrooms to make sure nobody says the evil “U” word.
A two-party-consent state requires both people to consent to being recorded. So even if you (tacitly) agree to being recorded as a condition of your employment, if the person on the other end of the conversation doesn’t then it’s an illegal recording. That’s why it probably wouldn’t be an issue in one of those states.
But in a one party state, the other person on the recording doesn’t have to consent as long as you do. So as long as you know your conversation is being recorded (again, hypothetically as a condition of employment) the other party (probably) doesn’t have any recourse should your employer use a third-party to monitor it.
In a two-party-consent state, maybe.
But in a one-party-consent state, all that Personnel Human Resources People Ops will do is point to a clause in your onboarding paperwork where you agreed to be recorded while on company property using company telephony equipment as a condition of your employment.
That’s because you all up there in America Lite hate capitalism, freedom, democracy, eagles, and baby Jesus.
It’ll come from the working class, like all wealth does.
Politicians passing laws based on things they don’t understand?
Quelle surprise.
But also:
a protection that’s been in place since the 1990s
That’s not necessarily a guarantee, c.f. Hyundai and Kia’s lack of ignition locks.
Xitter’s Grok.
Phil Collins, probably.
When my doggo was younger, we would just do that- drop it in the back of her throat then hold her mouth shut and massage her throat to encourage her to swallow. But now that she’s on a vet-prescribed regimen for probably the rest of her life, it’s just easier to pop a pill in the meat pouch since she just gobbles them up.
That’s probably because your cat chews her food, while my pupper inhales food as if she’s never gonna eat again, despite what every past day in her life might indicate. 😂
Have you tried something like a Pill Pocket?
My goldie-mutt would spit out every pill I ever gave her no matter how much cheese or peanut butter it was buried in, but since we started using these she gobbles them up instantly. The ding dong thinks she’s getting a treat everyday but joke’s on her, it’s her medicine.
Whether Nadella is running Microsoft well is a separate argument from whether trillion dollar corporations should be allowed to exist.
Twenty-year-old anti-Linux memes.
Real estate appreciates in value, human resources appreciate in cost. Clearly that’s a bad investment. /s
Also Dude, Ameriga isn’t the preferred nomenclature. Traitor-American, please.