That’s one option. But when I’ve never heard of ‘The Breach’ I’d like to be able to look at this persons history to judge if they are as unbiased as they’d like the reader to believe.
That’s one option. But when I’ve never heard of ‘The Breach’ I’d like to be able to look at this persons history to judge if they are as unbiased as they’d like the reader to believe.
Weird to me that this was published under a pseudonym? Surely they’ve given enough details to be identifiable to CBC.
No its not. Rape is a subcategory of Sexual Assault not the other way around. What this guy did was wrong. He is (probably) facing too light of a punishment for it (article says the crown wanted double). I’m just not an expert on these matters at all. But he didn’t rape her. Period.
You know cans are just plastic sacs using the tin/aluminum for structure right?
I’m not saying AI can’t be disruptive. I’m saying we aren’t there. The steady progress you think you are seeing is bought with increased processing power, the science isn’t advancing steadily, it advances in unpredictable jumps. Because the performance gained with processing power is reaching its peak, we’ll need at least another one of those unpredictable jumps for it to get to a state that will do what the comment I was responding to was claiming. It could be another 50 years before that happens, or it could be tomorrow.
The current AI boom is all based on a single paper from about 7 years ago, and has been achieved by just throwing more and more computing power at it. There has been basically no meaningful architecture improvements in that time and we are already seeing substantial fall off from throwing more power at the problem. I don’t think its a given at all that we are close to the kind of disruption you are predicting.
Science tells us how to achieve objectives, democracy what our objectives should be. (obviously this doesn’t always work perfectly in practice).
volunteer mods allow things like The Donald to exist.
Its basically also the past right? RSS feeds.
They were fired mid 2019, the CSIS report just came out.
Jokes on you, I just never stopped using SVN out of laziness.
The P in GPT is Pretrained. Its core to the architecture design. You would need to use some other ANN design if you wanted it to continuously update, and there is a reason we don’t use those at scale atm, they scale much worse than pretrained transformers.
The nature of quantum interactions being probabilistic could be some resource saving mechanism in a higher order simulation.
Its completely believable that it was targeted for fall of this year to be announced in this months nintendo direct, but they ran into complications.
According to this graph, most people. graph
Sure, the public doesn’t have access to a cutting edge research AI that public results from were only published a couple of days ago.
No one knows the long term benefits/costs yet, but its potentially more empowering to small creators than large ones. Everyone has access to the same tools, and for instance, if it can offload a bunch of work from an indy game dev, that could let them focus more on the part of the game design process they are most skilled at/interested in.
Its possible for them to have different interests. Its also possible for this to be the nucleation point that got things rolling without it really being the full cause.
I do think all levels of government have made some bad decisions that are unique to Canada, but yes they are. Our housing crisis is probably the worst example.