Wow, that’s big. Thank you for the clarification.
Wow, that’s big. Thank you for the clarification.
I’m not familiar with the service, can someone explain? Like, are all pipelines on Azure affected? Or is it some internal stuff where a company relying on paid tech forgot to pay for it?
I’m glad we aren’t friends.
How’s this programmer humor?
Alright, this is my first contribution to an open-source project, albeit indirect. I’ll drink to that!
Somebody should tell Albert and the others, they can let this method go.
“p” should be lowercase, the metalbags aren’t that good yet.
On the other hand, you have to keep your system specs up to date manually on protondb. I don’t know how many people keep their kernel and video driver versions up to date. Steam could pull the latest system configuration when I submit a review.
You should also install an app that would add periods and commas, because reading your texts is quite painful.
A software with zero support because the developers and the community speak only Russian. Thanks you, but no. If you want to go international, use English.
You’re more cautious with a meme than that lady with a grenade.
Last time I tried Codeberg, it went down every other day. So if this prompts you to switch, my advice is: don’t.
With that logic you can connect anything to anything. We can start posting news about war in Ukraine here or something like that, because with enough desire one can find even more indirect connections.
That sounds strange. I cannot comment on your particular case without seeing the test artifacts.
Generally speaking, there is nothing wrong with tests that ensure bad input doesn’t break the system, as this can easily lead to incorrect system states, damage to the environment, loss of data, money, reputation, and even lives - although most systems are not critical enough to threaten lives.
You wouldn’t need QAs if you only needed to validate that the product meets the requirements. In a typical company, many people are involved in that process. This includes the developer who wrote the code, the developer who reviewed it, and the people who conduct acceptance testing, among others. If your developers produce code that doesn’t meet the requirements, you’re in trouble.
I’m not saying that QA shouldn’t validate whether the system meets the requirements, but you don’t want them to do just that.
A QA engineer walks into a bar and asks where the bathroom is. The bar bursts into flames. The product owner says that the bar can be shipped anyway.
Great, it’s reliable and enforces design patterns!
I still don’t understand. I assume there is a plugin that enables github annotations in the code. But why would anyone need that?
Sounds good unless you really suck and there is no way for you to improve. I might or might not be speaking from experience.
Doesn’t Firefox on mobile can be configured to automatically close tabs after some period? I recall enabling that. That solves this problem!
Same. There are anyway much more games than one can find time to play them.