I have had a comment of mine removed from .ml for (correctly) indicating that hexbear is not a trustworthy instance.
I have had a comment of mine removed from .ml for (correctly) indicating that hexbear is not a trustworthy instance.
All fair. I haven’t tried either with the Deck, though that’s more because I don’t want to try games from either platform with a controller. I have had success running both on my Linux desktop, though.
This is just my experience, but I have had next to zero issues running games on the Deck that were related to the platform. Most problems I’ve encountered are along the lines of the game being KBM-centric and it being difficult to play with the controller inputs.
The only Linux-specific issues I can’t think of are related to trying to install or mod games outside of Steam (Skyrim in particular is far more difficult to mod on Linux than I expected).
AMD.
And it’s so ridiculously good. The NYT even wrote an article about it.
Most users of Windows aren’t editing the registry, no matter what problems they encounter.
For power users that do use regedit, I’d argue there’s still a gap between that and using a shell. The registry can be edited entirely with the Windows graphical utility, after all.
Unimpeachable logic!
Hell yeah! Groovy programmer here, mapping closures over lists of objects.
What company, EA? When did people stop buying their games?
china’s biggest crime is making close to as much money as we do.
Nah man, I’m pretty sure the Tiananmen square massacre was a bigger crime. Not to mention their genocide of the Uighur people, their oppression of Hong Kong, their attempts to steal Taiwan’s sovereignty.
ETA: big thanks to OP for so clearly and concisely showing they’re a tankie.
Pal, bud, friendo, sport, tiger, chief, boss.
I brought it up purely as speculation, as one possible explanation for why the process was not properly followed. I don’t have any experience with publishing companies, whether for science journals or otherwise.
A few things came together for me here.
The paper had two reviewers, one in India and one based in the U.S.
.
“…a reviewer of the paper had raised concerns about the AI-generated images that were ignored.”
.
…the U.S.-based reviewer who said that they evaluated the study based solely on its scientific merits and that it was up to Frontiers whether or not to publish the AI-generated images…
.
"The authors failed to respond to these requests. We are investigating how our processes failed to act on the lack of author compliance… "
They don’t outright say it in the article, but it looks like the reviewer based in India was the one who actually raised concerns about the garbage images. The authors were supposed to respond, but didn’t, and the journal published anyway.
I will readily admit that this is just my own conclusion here, but – I wonder if there was an element of racism that went into ignoring the reviewer’s concerns?
I’m in agreement that this stuff is painfully useless.
But “it couldn’t even find the meeting” sounds more like a configuration problem and less like a comment on the product’s quality.
What? You must be joking. Really? The entire thing was about opt-in error reporting?
… seriously, that can’t be it, can it?
No? It’s a cover page for an hour long podcast episode. Not that that’s much better, as I am certainly not going to set aside time for that, but it’s not “just an ad for a blog that doesn’t exist yet”.
Was that not something the Wayback Machine could have solved?
I speak English, I studied Latin but have not kept up, and I know a tiny bit of Japanese and French.