Flash was also cancer that ruined web pages.
The reason Java Web Start wasn’t, was specifically because once you clicked on the link, it downloaded the app and started it as a real desktop application, with its own window and taskbar entry and whatnot. It didn’t rely on being embedded in HTML (I’m specifically not talking about Java applets, BTW – they sucked too) or manipulating the DOM for its UI; it could use Swing and have the same look and feel as a native application.
Shoulda been something more like Java Web Start.
to make pages run faster and better.
Huh, well that’s a funny way of saying “break the model of web page as document and fuck up the entire web!”
You can tell there ought to be substructures because he used comments to label the different groups. That’s a code smell right there.
As far as I know, I’ve only installed Flatpaks using the terminal. The most annoying thing about them for me is having to type out the fully-qualified name of the software (e.g. org.mozilla.firefox instead of just firefox), which is a very terminal-specific issue, LOL!
War with who? I’m posting this from Kubuntu and I’d happily agree with you that Snap should fuck off and die. (In particular, the backend being controlled by Canonical makes it objectively bad compared to Flatpak.) Even among people like me who tolerate Snap (for now…), I really don’t think you’re gonna find anybody who actually likes it, let alone enough to champion it.
Can’t start a war when there’s a consensus!
I dunno, but I feel like posting this!
It’s not even a very big house. It looks maybe 40’ or so wide and somewhat less deep, so I’m guessing it’s maybe 3000 sq. ft. total. I would almost hesitate to even bestow the status of ‘McMansion’ on it.
I’m sure they are. They have to be, unless they’re steel inside instead (which is unlikely), because you can’t make real stacked-stone masonry that skinny and have it be stable.
And that’s my problem with it: it’s fraudulent. Not even in an intentional “flouting the rules to make a modernist point” kind of way either; just out of ignorant and lazy design.
I hate columns like that. Everything else is kind of a (bad) choice, but those columns are just objectively wrong because masonry doesn’t work like that.
Lock focus because auto focus for this kind of thing will almost always result in blurry photos
I feel like people should do that a lot more often than they do, just in general. Especially when using a DSLR to make a video of a subject that isn’t moving around much.
(This is really just venting because I watch too many Youtube videos where they complain about the autofocus not working well.)
It hasn’t been “buggy as fuk” for at least half a decade. Why are you spreading misinformation?
Same, except seven.
My other reply to you was literally entirely composed of a supporting link. Quit being disingenuous.
And he inflicted JavaScript upon the world, completely wrecking the World Wide Web. Fucker should burn in Hell for that, let alone the other stuff!
That sounds less like clickbait and more an object lesson in the importance of copyleft to me.
Considering the kinds of questions OP was asking, which group does it sound like he falls into?