Its been heavily traded and guardrailed to not make judgements.

While Reagan is the instrument that set America the path to hell, Bill Clinton was the right hand who crushed any idea of a rebound by labor. One can only assume both Clintons were critical in selling the DNC to capital.

You didn’t even write your own kernel, sad!

Marx didn’t anticipate information technology. Because of IT, we are moving to a new regime of humanity. The automation of action is part of the reason, but the most important is the ability of any group of people to communicate. The control of broadcast underpins the prior structures of power. Now, anyone can reach everyone, and we are watching the power of the state erode in the rise of fascism globally.

Yes.

It was fairly fragmented but hardly a whole lot of nothing.

How recently did you try this?

Sounds like chicago needs to do something about how close those other states are.

They don’t exist?

Just build trains…

What are you using that makes it crash, virtually never happens to me.

That’s a pretty good analogy, but it’s Fortran and B-52. Fortran is very good at what it does to this day. Cobol was never good.

Cars that have never had a style update. Now that they exist in meaningful numbers they look old and tired.

If getting people back into work makes your property more valuable that the productive losses, it’s not a sunk cost. The leaders might be doing their math wrong, but they are not necessarily making a sunk cost fallacy here.

However, i do agree it’s likely a choice driven by power and personalities, not money. I suspect a lot of talk about how remote workers can be abused and controlled has happened.

They don’t have leases. They own that real estate. So its value is a considerable line item in the company’s value. If they get people in office, it’s a boost to the company’s value. The property is hit yet sunk in their eyes.

No, it does not. It means that they think it’s more profitable for shareholders.

Internet should be a public utility and owned by the local government.

The core issue here is we don’t know how to measure the skill of learning directly.

Big yes to the scam that is liberal democracy. One terrible use of libs calling things democracy when they aren’t is blanketly condemning everyone in some place bc someone got elected: Russia and every red state in the USA. These places are full of people who do not support the government and had no real chance of electing real representation nor would those elected officals really be useful.

If the wisdoms are wrong or sub optimal, but the followers treat them as dogmatic then its an issue.