There is genuinely something wrong with you.
There is genuinely something wrong with you.
If you meant a different term with a different meaning then you should use that term and even in that case I doubt that the fair use clause would stand as a defense.
You could be honest and acknowledge that there is a massive difference in time investment and skill required between the old way of creating fake porn of unconsenting people and the new way.
The fuck is wrong with you?
The YouTube algorithm is garbage. More than once it’s just completely removed channels I watch pretty much daily from my suggestions. The not interested filter is woefully inadequate as they have no idea what the actual reason for disinterest was. I still get 100 flavors of lofi videos in my suggestions despite flagging every single one. YouTube’s interpretation of that? Remove all other forms of music.
So does that mean that you can get 1 micron accuracy as long as the part is sized to a multiple of the pixels width on the x and y? Is that just for aligned straight edges or can that be done for curves too?
Which printer is giving you 1 micron precision?
That all hinges on a pretty big “could”.
I mean in your hypothetical their options would be to either spend effort to send you something worthless or not spend the effort and experience zero difference on their end.
I didn’t call you that but your responses do lend some credibility to the notion. If you don’t want to be taken seriously fine, I don’t really care
Nah I was trying to help ya but it sounds like you might be closer to the mind set that I was trying to help you not sound like.
That’s cool man if you want to keep sounding like a dime store Don Quixote. The adversarial subtext of your phrasing will make the majority of people ignore you and will taint the perception of whatever you cite.
You’d be taken a lot more seriously if you dropped the “admission” phrasing.
A significant portion of the right doesn’t even respect their humanity, respecting their sovereignty is going to be a tough one.
You did not imagine that. I remember back when Google was being obnoxious about that. They cut it out years ago though, possibly after some bad pr over it.
I had kinda the opposite experience using Bard. It made up random technical details for the questions I asked. It assured me that it knew the contents of a document that it didn’t have access to and generated what it claimed was information from that document rather than saying it couldn’t read it and didn’t know.
I think you would be surprised how many people would not only understand but also engage in the same activity.