Not me but…

Most of the data driven web already does. Whats the fediverse run on?

Json is superior and thats a hill im willing to die on

I’ve run into a few.

Only non-residents have to pay for a wolf hunting license. Canadian residents can kill as many as they want.

Up to the area limit?

The province also has a wolf cull that uses helicopters to hunt.

What does the means by which this is accomplished matter?

targeted areas by 80 per cent

Key word there being targeted areas.

Where does the 3wolves/1000km^2 come from. Is this in certain areas or nationally surly in cities u would want this number a lot closer to 0wolves/1000km^2.

Attributing this purly to hunting being big business seems a little extreme. We need someone with an actuall degree in proper environment management for Canadian wilderness to way in on appropriate numbers/density but the odds of such a person being on lemmy seems low.

Heres the issue nobody has the balls to talk about tho. We have fucked the environment and the ratio of wildlife within it. You cannot simply let nature do as it pleases becuase we have destroyed the carful balances that was created by millions of years of evolution. Since we have fucked nature to a point where it cannot naturally mediate itself it is now our responsibility to ensure a sustainable environment is maintained. Such maintenance involves the management of all species and management means everything from introductions to controlled culling.

For example in australia we have wayyyyy to many kangaroos to the point that they are harmful to the environment itself. We caused this and if is our responsibility to cull a certain number every year to ensure the environment is sustainable.

I know many american states and would assume Canada follow a scheme where the number of animals that can be killed is limited to to keep populations at correct levels. Hence government sanctioned wolf culls. We chose to reintroduced wolves (I would argue for the better) we have thus taken on the responsibility to manage said populations in a sustainable manner.

And if this artist has any claim then sue on copyright grounds dont spread misinformation in a factually incorrect sob story.

Removed by mod

How its the ultimate embodiment of free speach the marketplace of ideals and competition. Id classify these as liberal ideas but ive notices a lot of the Americanised left wing doeant seem to agree with these anymore.

Id like more right wingers. Not in a i like them kind of a way in a i want lemmy more representative of the population kind of way. I also think we really need to be pushing harder on the free speach free marketplace of ideas we have created.

Thats probably what did it. Guess when given the options of let us track you or provide your real identity for us to track you. The option of fucking off is best.

I tried but they demanded a phone number and credit card for “verification” and fuck that.

You can learn a lot from the stupid baseless opinions. Learning what they are omitting what they are lieing about what they are pushing.

Well u need to know enough about sonthing before you cant tell if your being bullshit or not. Generally i just try get every single perspective i can and make my own decision. I assume everyone has a slant but by watching everyone u can cancel that out.

Youtube u gotta get the widest set of opinions possible. Unfortunatly peertube just lacks content.

Fuck no give me a reason to.

Ok makes sence but im still relying on the agrigation service acting in good faith. I dont trust anything that isnt my computer. Even with context this is a bad look and not helping Firefox’s cause when people start screaming about it without context.

Come on guys lets just fix fingerprinting ik the standard is to make every device identical but thats never gonna work and sounds like an easy way to track anyone who hardens more than default settings. We need to have eveey browser generate different data for every test for everything makw so much noise the signal is imperceptible.

While proving that 6 is not prime illustrates proving a negative in math, the caution arises in complex, real-world scenarios of non well defined domains. Demonstrating absences beyond math’s clarity and definiteness can be challenging if not impossible to say the least.

Its a common, clear, and logic extension of the scientific process that you cannot prove a negative. I dont gets whats so complicated about this. Please since you are such an expert in the ways of calmly stating positions give me 1 single example of proving a negative with science.

Hey look at that hexbear has shown up to be anti science and anti logic because eliminating doublethink doesnt align with the communist tagline.

Well thats fucking concerning. Perhaps get the basics down before u start practising anything.