There is nothing wrong with modifying the model to make it look better, printers print differently, end results look different. It would be a benchmark still, as in you obviously can print better, you just need to make necessary modificafions.

Benchy license apparently prohibits derivative works. hackaday

Tool calling is cool funcrionality, agreed. How does it relate to openai blowing its own sails?

It works as expected, they give it system prompt that conflicts with subsequent prompts. Everything else looks like typical llm behaviour, as in gaslightning and doubling down. At least that’s what Iu see in tweets.

There is artificial, there is no intelligence, there is a whole lot of artificial neural networks without any intelligence. As in calling them ai in the sense that these are thinking machines comparable to some animal (human for example) is misleading.

Do you disagree?

It is propaganda in its purest form, again people are trained by propaganda to view it as sonething bad and only done by evil organizations. Of course “scary pictures” work on cigarettes, that’s their intended purpose, and they would work as well on alcohol or whatever would be unacceptable next year. I’m not against and don’t care much about something that happens essentially in a different world.

Does it matter?

Your bias shows, there was nothing in my post about good or evil doctors.

They do work, they are not for “education” or “information”. Just another proof that propaganda works on everyone.

They written that it doubles-down when accused of being in the wrong in 90% of cases. Sounds closer to bug than success.

There is no ai in ai, you chain them more or less the same as you chain browser or pdf viewer installed on your device.

"Open"ai tells fairy tales about their “ai” being so smart it’s dangerous since inception. Nothing to see here.

In this case it looks like click-bate from news site.

It makes it frustrating to use, not secure. When installed program stops working after 30 or whatever days of me not using it because my great white master decided that it doesn’t need what was granted by me at installation is not security it’s just spitting in my face. I don’t care about what “developers” want why should anyone?

Well, maybe mark bad cables or use them for charging only? Type-c is not a data transfer standard, so usb 2.0 rates aren’t something to complain about. Certified cables do have clear markings on them.

So they want xbox game pass only without games and microsoft money? Great plan!