After all, that’s why git is there, to help me remember the shit I put all over the place. (Ok, it might have some other uses.)
After all, that’s why git is there, to help me remember the shit I put all over the place. (Ok, it might have some other uses.)
The other day I was having a bad day and had a call from an unknown number, so I decided to pick up but let them talk first. They just hang up and have not called again.
I don’t think it was a good idea to pick up in the first place, but it was curious in the end.
But you’ll at least let us take a smaller or bigger peek right? Don’t worry we have a screen recorder ready, you don’t have to do anything.
C pew pew
Outlook (new new new final)
Yet?
If you have to cast your joke it isn’t funny?
cat
Ahhhhh, fuck. I’m quite noob with linux. I got into some rabbit hole trying to read the docs. I found 2 man pages, one is cat(1) and the other cat(1p). Apparently the 1p is for POSIX.
If someone could help me understand… As far as I could understand I would normally be concerned with (1), but what would I need to be doing to be affected by (1p)?
How you see your projects trying to accept that you might need to compromise.
Next time trying to handle a date…
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
It has always sounded to me that that line is from people annoyed because they didn’t get an answer. And I don’t believe they figured anything out.
The kind bullshit that makes me extract a value from a cache I just calculated just to make sure it is working.
And why did you feel the need to bring up those suppressed memories?
I take it as people just joking. Personally I’m in doubt if the tweet is serious and the new book is true, or is it just a joke about refactoring/re-writing code.