roguetrick

Do not go to your unit manager with this shit. Take report, give care, give report, leave. Otherwise acknowledge and move on. Every nurse thinks they’re the best nurse. It’s just how it is.

If you don’t want to talk to someone, just tell them you forgot to chart something and then ignore them. They’ll get the hint.

This is a profession that, for better or worse, attracts type A personalities.

Edit: and most charge nurses would not intervene in this either.

The 17th percentile in peds is not surprising. The model mixing it’s training data with adults would absolutely kill someone.

GPT will require every test and yet for the sake of authenticity randomly perform medical errors.

Just making shit up for ragebait is trolling my friend, it’s not having an opinion. What he posted has no relation to the interview.

Why put this much effort in trying to getting banned? Is making up a story based on the headline a creative writing exercise for you?

To be clear, you’re arguing that (considering the increase in population) desktop computer ownership per capita may be falling?

Always an impressive operation they have one peering point in San Francisco and their data centers historically consist of a church and shipping containers.

https://www.theregister.com/2017/11/16/head_like_a_memory_hole/

Damn small Linux. Not really “installed” of course, but was fun to play around with.

precious hamburgers?

There’s a whole lot of bullshit going on around this story. People are acting like she violated national security interests, but they can’t articulate how. Like she shipped ebola to wuhan, but she wasn’t fired for that because cooperation with high level labs is kind of important (and I’m sure wuhan already HAD a sample of ebola before she even shipped it). The findings she shared would’ve been shared eventually(and the reason it started a kerfluffle is because China shared them and included her in as a co-author in a paper and included her in patents for ebolavirus treatments). You can still say she was working “against Canada” if you really want to twist it, but that’s not really what happened. She violated policy and got fired, then said the firing was unjust. The potential damage to Canada comes from intellectual property interests but there’s not much money in treating Ebola in the first place.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/ebola-henipah-china-1.5232674

Researchers working at the National Microbiology Lab on cutting-edge, high-containment research are not allowed to send anything to other countries or labs without the intellectual property office negotiating and having a material transfer agreement in place, in case the material sent leads to a notable discovery.

I sure hope people are sharing this research with Zimbabwe. They’ve got endemic marburg virus to deal with. The frank truth is, for something like Ebola, sequencing it isn’t going to change how you weaponize it. You weaponize it by breeding it and then blowing it up at low heat so it spreads over a large area. Any contact with it leads to infection, it’s a nasty bug.

This is different, than say, anthrax weaponization. You can go to cattle farms, dig in the dirt, and culture it, and you will eventually isolate anthrax. That strain, however, won’t really go into spore form well and won’t be super pathogenic. You’ll need to infect a bunch of sheep with it and try to get a better strain, like they did in my hometown at Ft. Detrick. Then you use specific drying methods to make it turn into weapons grade spores. That’s why specific strains are important with anthrax and you could theoretically use something like CRISPR to make your own that’s better than what you can find digging in the dirt.

I seriously cannot parse these two statements

The document show the service had a more rosy initial assessment of Qiu’s motivation, noting in spring of 2020 that she could be “susceptible … based on the belief in the power of science to help humanity.”

But as the investigation went deeper, CSIS’s concerns deepened. A few months later, CSIS wrote Qiu was using the level 4 lab in Canada “as a base to assist China to improve its capability to fight highly-pathogenic pathogens” and “achieved brilliant results.”

They’re the same picture

Like I get it, you want to secure medical research. And she was likely inappropriately sharing unpublished data against lab policy. But the tone shift they’re trying to make doesn’t connect for me.

Yikes.

I’m not knowledgeable about it for sure, it just seems rather next to impossible to tank an IPO with borrowed shares alone.

Kbin didn’t feel like translating your example.

Most you can short it in a day is 10 percent right? I dunno if they’re disciplined enough.

Your move, creep.

I wouldn’t even call these ridiculous AI images stock photos anymore.

Edit: my bad, that one’s real from a real photo shoot. Shame they blurred his guy Fawkes mask.

https://www.shutterstock.com/g/gorodenkoff/sets/63992730

wholesome

And the NSA quietly installed their own.

You are a sensitive dude.