• MoogleMaestro@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I imagine they’ll eventually find a way to prevent us from blocking ads. Twitch TV for example has found some ways to make adblock useless.

    It’s a shame, and it’s really just a side effect of google racing to the bottom of the adspace game. If ads weren’t as cheap as they are today, they wouldn’t be trying to maximize the amount of users who are forced to see advertisements.

    • logicbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      1 year ago

      I suspect ad blocking will always be an arms race. The server can only ask the client to play the ad, and then rely on the client to truthfully report whether it did so.

      • r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m sure they’ll try to implement some type of DRM BS into the web that allows them. It’s one of the good things about projects like Gemini. I used to think it was only good for the novelty of having a web alternative protocol.

        No doubt Big Tech would lobby for Microsoft to use Windows to flag Gemini browsers as malicious and then run FUD campaigns against the Gemini protocol

        • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          They already do this on the YouTube TV app

          It’s amazing how many times someone in this thread has joked about Google doing something absurd sounding only for it to already be true.

        • zurohki@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          You have to be careful with that sort of thing - some percentage of people who do watch the ads will close the tab rather than read the prompt and answer it.

      • shamrock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s only a matter of time before they start embedding them into the video like podcasts do and you won’t be able tell the difference between ad and video with software.

        • Gabu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Timestamps can still be voluntarily marked for an auto-skip feature to jump throughthe ads.

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, that’s just brilliant! Instead of being interrupted by intrusive ads, I’m seeing videos of fluffy cats doing adorable and funny stuff all the time.

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Worst case scenario I think I’d just resort to downloading the videos to watch. Live videos is the challenge, but luckily I don’t watch live streams.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bruh, your not gonna believe this, but the ducks at the park are free. if you use one of these, you can download all the ducks you want. I downloaded 9000 ducks so far.

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be fair, he was talking about live streams, as in watching people in real-time.

          That can be a fairly different experience, especially since downloaders don’t grab the chat at the moment. Also for unarchived streams, they can only be downloaded if you are aware and able to download at the time that the stream is still active.

    • dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ll start banning Google accounts, that’ll stop quite alot of people just because of how many users use gmail or drive.

      • Chailles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think they’ll resort to that because that would mean getting rid of their own source of income. YouTube may not be getting ad revenue, but they still collect data and that’s where the real value is.