So basically i want try other rolling release distributions besides Vanilla Arch Linux So Give your thoughts on which is the best and also how to install the wifi drivers on Endeavour os and Gentoo Linux For a better experience

        • Nibodhika@lemmy.worldEnglish
          14·
          1 year ago

          If your Arch breaks down it’s likely any rolling release distro will also, because it means you’re likely not doing part of the maintenance a rolling release needs, such as ensuring the config files you’ve changed get properly updated.

          Any rolling release distro is unstable, because unstable doesn’t mean what you think it means, it means that any library can be updated.

          • Mohamad20ZX@lemmy.oneOPEnglish
            31·
            1 year ago

            ok thanks for correcting my mistake and I’m sure arch isn’t impossible to use just a little bit tinky

          • null@slrpnk.netEnglish
            2·
            1 year ago

            That’s a fair point, but I think the definition of “breaking” tends to correlate with experience.

            There are certain things that will “break” in Arch that are trivial to fix for me now, but were a real pain when I first started using it (GPG key errors come to mind).

            Even things like the Grub issue from around a year ago – that’s something I could probably fix with a little reading now, but at the time I just ended up re-installing.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              2·
              1 year ago

              Fair. I used Arch when I was already quite familiar with Linux, so I really didn’t have any issues. I would just read the update notes before running updates, and the only one that gave me trouble was the switch to systemd some 5-10 years ago.

              I have since switched to Tumbleweed because I wanted my server and desktop to use the same tools, but I want my server to run stable Linux. I use Leap on my servers and I’ll probably switch my server to MicroOS one of these days.

              So far, Tumbleweed has been less of a pain than Arch, but that doesn’t mean Arch was unstable, it just required a little hand holding from time to time.

        • Solar Bear@slrpnk.netEnglish
          91·
          1 year ago

          Arch very rarely breaks on its own. But if the manually driven style of Arch is not what you’re looking for, try OpenSUSE Tumbleweed or Slowroll.

      • alehc@lemmy.worldEnglish
        31·
        1 year ago

        I love endeavour, really can’t go wrong with it. Is super lightweight, rolling-release, archbased (so you have AUR) and more robust than arch I’d say. It has never failed me.

        However, my dad’s endeavour system broke once, idk if it was because no maintenance or what… I guess no system is perfect.

  • raptir@lemdro.idEnglish
    161·
    1 year ago

    I love openSUSE Tumbleweed. It has a solid automated testing process that means packages will be held back rather than updating and breaking things.

    • Mohamad20ZX@lemmy.oneOPEnglish
      11·
      1 year ago

      That’s what im going to use daily use anyway and for gaming as well but that because fedora doesn’t detect my wifi drivers at least opensuse slowroll is looking good for a backup os

  • Quazatron@lemmy.worldEnglish
    6·
    1 year ago

    Most Linux distributions are quite reliable, even rolling ones. What usually causes instability are the closed source applications people choose to run on them.

    I’m not just pointing out nVidia drivers, I’ve seen Teams and Visual Studio Code crash an otherwise stable Ubuntu LTS.

  • superbirra@lemmy.worldEnglish
    72·
    1 year ago

    I have used debian for 20 years, I am very happy with it. Also zero problems with gaming nowadays

  • iopq@lemmy.worldEnglish
    72·
    1 year ago

    NixOS because you can roll back when anything breaks, install stable versions of packages, and put your configuration in version control

    • null@slrpnk.netEnglish
      3·
      1 year ago

      And if you need to reinstall – look at that, your whole config is documented as code.

  • mitch8128@lemmy.mlEnglish
    61·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been running the same arch install for atleast 5 years… I honestly can’t recommend any other distro because I haven’t used many for a long enough period of time

    • Mohamad20ZX@lemmy.oneOPEnglish
      13·
      1 year ago

      Ok but I won’t use stable distributions until im need to use them and how did not crash from maintenance and downloaded too many softwares

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        I also used Arch for 5+ years and had very few issues. If you know what you’re doing, it’s not hard to keep it running stable.

        I’m now on Tumbleweed and have even fewer issues.

        But honestly, what’s wrong with stable distros? I recommend them by default because there’s far less chance for anything to go wrong day to day, and your only concern is at release time. I switched because I’m a developer and using the latest is better for me so I can test on the latest versions of things. I also prefer to fix things as I go instead of potentially lose a day to a release upgrade going sideways (happened twice, once with Ubuntu and again with Fedora).

        Btw, Tumbleweed is great because it configures snapper by default, which let’s you roll back if an upgrade goes poorly. I’ve used it a few times over 2-3 years, mostly when my NVIDIA driver got mismatched from the kernel. I’m now on an AMD GPU and haven’t needed it since.

  • fosforus@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    73·
    1 year ago

    I mean it’s not really rolling, but since this is Linux Gaming, I recommend checking out Nobara Linux. It’s a Fedora fork made by GloriousEggroll of the proton-GE fame. It’s the easiest Linux gaming experience I’ve had so far, at least with the non-modified Gnome version.

    IMHO, you should avoid KDE – I’ve had nothing but bad experiences there – but if that’s your favourite poison go ahead.

    https://nobaraproject.org/

    • HeyLow 🏳️‍⚧️@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      7·
      1 year ago

      It’s always really interesting seeing how people can have completely different experiences with kde and gnome!

      I have had nothing but a great experience with kde for years but every time I’ve tried gnome it’s always been a buggy experience!

      • fosforus@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        21·
        1 year ago

        Sure. Rolling distros aren’t an “advanced form” of Linux though, just different.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Why mess with the kernel? The standard one works fine and you’re likely looking at 1-2% difference either way.

      Also, stable isn’t rolling, that’s in the name.

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        Liquorix and Zen kernels have different cpu scheduler which makes them more responsive for desktop usage under heavy load.

        Theoretically this reduces throughput but it’s barely measurable, compared to the noticeably better responsiveness.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          2·
          1 year ago

          I doubt it’s as noticeable as you make it out to be. I use the default kernel shipped with OpenSUSE Tumbleweed and the system is acceptably responsive while under load, with the main exception being low memory situations (i.e. heavy swap usage). But I expect the Zen scheduler to have similar issues.

          Then again, I probably have more tolerance for poor responsiveness because I rarely run my system to its limits (unless compiling) and rarely interact with other apps while playing games.

          • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
            3·
            1 year ago

            It’s only been noticeable while compiling and looking at animations. It might also just be placebo or I’m misremembering since it’s been many months since I “tested” it.

            It wasn’t my intention to make it sound like it’s a giant improvement. It’s marginal but if it’s simple to install I’d say go for it.

  • FOSS Is Fun@lemmy.mlEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    Have you considered a fixed release in combination with rolling applications (i. e. Flatpak, Snap)?

    If you choose Fedora (preferably one of the atomic variants, like Silverblue), you would also get a rolling kernel and rolling KDE Plasma desktop, so overall the experience can be quite close to a rolling release distribution if you install the desktop applications via Flatpak.

    Ubuntu “interim” (non-LTS) releases are usually also fairly current and could be a good choice if you don’t mind Snap. There’s also the option of following the Ubuntu “devel” branch, which always refers to the current pre-release version of Ubuntu (e. g. 24.04 at the moment) and is rolling.

    Just wanted to give you a different direction to think about. ;)

    • Mohamad20ZX@lemmy.oneOPEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      thanks I haven’t known about it but I have Opensuse Tumbleweed for gaming use and endeavour os for the aur

      • null@slrpnk.netEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        Just FYI, if you like EndeavourOS, you should know that it’s essentially an installer for Vanilla Arch (unlike Majaro which is Arch-based).

        So you may have just had bad luck when you tried Vanilla Arch that you didn’t have with EndeavourOS – but there’s no real difference between the 2 besides manual vs GUI installer.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        Depending on what you want, OpenSUSE’s OBS is a great alternative to the AUR. It works by building software given a script, so you still just download binary packages, unlike the AUR where you download build scripts.

        I honestly haven’t needed much since switching from Arch to openSUSE, though I’ve played with some OBS packages here and there. I used to maintain some AUR packages, and I haven’t needed to on Tumbleweed.

        Give it a shot, you probably don’t need both. I prefer Tumbleweed these days, but I’ve used Tumbleweed and Arch both for about the same amount of time (5-ish years) and can recommend both.

  • GustavoM@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3·
    1 year ago

    Debian hands down delivers the most stable experience of em all – even after updating from stable to sid.

    t. Did exactly that on a unsupported sbc, “Orange pi zero 3”, and everything works.

        • Mohamad20ZX@lemmy.oneOPEnglish
          21·
          1 year ago

          I was guessing but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t work And yes I know Debain is easy nowadays but regardless I will try Debain or even better MX Linux and Linux mint Debain edition

          • psycho_driver@lemmy.worldEnglish
            2·
            1 year ago

            Delving into the realm of non-rolling distros, yes MX is quite good (sits on top of Debian). I’ve used the latest version on a laptop seeing almost daily use for 1.5 years or so and zero issues. And thread originator is correct, Debian is the gold standard for a stable linux experience.

            • Mohamad20ZX@lemmy.oneOPEnglish
              2·
              1 year ago

              that’s why I want to try it later because it’s the really Best Distro for most of my old computers that otherwise use puppy or antix

    • Mohamad20ZX@lemmy.oneOPEnglish
      21·
      1 year ago

      Ok do you know sparkly Linux is great rolling distribution in addition to pclinux os

  • theshatterstone54@feddit.ukEnglish
    3·
    1 year ago

    I’d say Tumbleweed is what you’re looking for. They have some sort of automated testing process (OpenQA, I think) and are far more stable than Arch, while oftentimes having newer versions of packages before Arch.