• LordBelphegor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    tankies are a special kind of left, to them authoritarianism, genocide and aparthied are ok if it fuels ‘the revolution’.

          • LordBelphegor@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah yes, if are against the revolution, u must be a capitalist. Personlaly I am a democratic socialist.

            But i am aware of red propaganda to hijack socialist spaces, spread CCP propaganda of how they did nothing wrong and everything is some CIA op.

            Its incredible how much humanity tankies lack when govts commit atrocities against their own just to stay in power. Killing local languages and cultures. Forcing people to rid of their identity and replaced by whoever is in the majority. Assaulting dissidents in foreign soil.

            Censorship is ok as long the red side is doing it. Fuck the Uigyurs right cuz they arent Han Chinese Mandarin speaking people, fuck the Tibetans right cuz they arent Han Chinese, fuck the Inner Mongolians and their desire to keep their language alive? Fuck Taiwan right, my imperialistic goal is more important than the will of Taiwanese. Fuck South East Asia right? The whole of the South China Sea belongs to me cuz i said so. Fuck Indian borders right, my imperialist tendancies are important. The CCP seems quite racist to me.

            Your whole rhethoric is to use copy pasta of long paragraphs and claim everyone against the red army are US spies, when infact we are neither. You are not a communist or socialist, you are an agent of authoritarianism and a prime example of the horse shoe theory.

            Even the left is not with you. You are simply an autocrat disguised as a leftist.

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not to lean to heavy on the whataboutree but you can’t really use that as an excuse when the criticism is coming from the left. They don’t support the other thing either, so it seems almost like deflection from valid criticism and a missed opportunity to tackle a contradiction.

        • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          The US has > 800 external military bases. Every other country combined has < 20. Which one is credible?

          • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Why don’t you apply dialectical materialism and tell me what you think. You’d get a lot farther than using a thought-terminating cliché.

            Or put a little more directly, what makes more sense in taking down that behemoth: finding common ground with people who ultimately want the same thing as you, or dying on a hill and banishing anyone who disagrees with something that isn’t even relevant in this day and age?

            It’s a deeply reactionary urge to want to win the ideal at the cost of the material. It’s why liberalism has gotten as far as it has.

            • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Sure, diamat would say that in the age of super-imperialism that we’re now in, where the majority of surplus value comes from super-exploited global-south proletarians, demands that one or a group of countries must use violence to enforce that order, and keep the exploited countries weak and poor.

              Capitalism’s current enforcer is the US, with its military might, dollar hegemony, and media monopoly. That is why the US has so many external military bases. They don’t have them because they’re fun to build.

              • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Then you can see how people would want to go from hyperexploitation to no exploitation, rather than daydreaming of the lesser of two evils.

                Actually, most people are libs who genuinely got off twitter so they could join bluesky, so they want slightly less hyperexploitation 😒

      • bigboismith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re saying that like Russia and China don’t have slave labor camps and haven’t been bombing Africans and Muslims for decades.

        • Dieguito 🦝@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, he has said nothing about China or Russia. (Self?) criticism is a sign of maturity and wit. Being a western and adhere to western values doesn’t imply assuming justifying it all. In the west we do not have total freedom of speech and/or pluralism of information and, yes, there are worrying “new” forms of slavery.

          • teichflamme@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You can’t say western news aren’t trustworthy and then rule out basically any other source of news implied. Unless your point is that news cannot be trusted from anyone ever, which is kinda a moot point.

            If you discount the entire west you are left with Russia, China, the middle east, Africa.

            None of them have a better track record in human rights violation then the west, which you discredited for exactly that.

          • bigboismith@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            China and Russia are absolutely relevant, since this post is about tankies. This isn’t deflecting critique of the west, it’s pointing out the hipocrasy of using these faults in the US as a defence of Russia/China.

        • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re saying that like Russia and China don’t have slave labor camps and haven’t been bombing Africans and Muslims for decades.

          Where on earth are you getting this?? China hasn’t been involved in an external conflict since the 60s!

          • bigboismith@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Admittedly China hasn’t militarily invaded another country since it’s invasion of Vietnam in 79. Though the Uyghur genocide doesn’t strike me as a lot more benevolent than the ongoing wars in Africa and Middle East.

            • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              The majority of the world (notably the vast majority of Muslim countries, who would be burdened with a refugee crisis if there were an actual genocide) doesn’t think China is killing Uyghurs. Only the imperial core countries, that have been bombing Muslims for decades think that:

              Here’s the people telling you that China is killing Muslims: