• Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why?

    Everything successful fb has done in more than a decade is copying or acquiring competitors.

    Zuck has spent a few years setting $36,000,000,000 on fire building secondlife2, that nobody wants. The stock is down 25% in the last 2 years.

    facebook is like google, both are advertising companies at their core. They both leveraged one idea to serve adds really well and have failed to produce anything new in house since.

    • master5o1@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Calling it verified is the only problem for a paid service. Name it Premium, +, anything else that implies a value added experience. But pay for verification is stupid.

      • docious@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you. The verified word is the sticking point. If you’re not honest, people won’t believe you – oddly enough.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why?

      Everything successful fb has done in more than a decade is copying or acquiring competitors.

      Fair and accurate.

      Zuck has spent a few years setting $36,000,000,000 on fire building secondlife2, that nobody wants.

      Despite everyone wanting them to fail, this is inaccurate. They’ve sold as much Quest hardware as Microsoft sells Xboxes in the same time period, and those cost figures include hardware, and ALL their VR software, across multiple different games and apps. They did not spend that much on Horizon Worlds which is their failed second life clone.

      facebook is like google, both are advertising companies at their core. They both leveraged one idea to serve adds really well and have failed to produce anything new in house since.

      Again, fair and accurate, though missing the mechanism for how this occurs. Because they’re advertising companies, they’re great at tracking users and prioritizing market research. This is what makes them great at copying stuff, because they’re very very good at using market research and user data to determine which are the features actually worth copying.

  • Ddhuud@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What is they are “verifying”? That the account holder had 12 or 15 bucks to throw away?

    • ilmagico@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The way it was meant to be, when social media started doing that, is that it verifies your identity. You use your real name (or stage name, or business name) in the account, and they “verify” it actually belongs to you and not an impostor.

      Now instead, it verifies that you paid the fee, and your account name could be Napoleon Bonaparte for what they care.

  • soulifix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does anyone remember being around people, when you were a kid, that awarded you behavioral stickers that are holographic and had various shapes like stars or animals?

    This is exactly what this stupid verification thing is about. OoOOOoO, I’m so special that I got a fucking checkmark next to my name and I actually spend money that could’ve gone to something else worthwhile just to keep it! /s

    I feel like we’re in a world where all of these companies are fronted by childish adults that treat all of their userbases like these kinds of kids. But they pretend that they’re adults because they do business things.

  • ProfessorZhu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mistakes? The premium was one of the best choices Musk made. Everyone kept using it and it allowed him to just extract wealth from people for no consequences. Why wouldn’t other companies follow suit?

  • Saneless@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the same price as an entire TV subscription where you can watch hundreds of shows and movies, all month if you’d like, would you like to have a few pixels change next to your name and have your experience be almost entirely the exact same as it is for free?

    These people are out of touch

  • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean, shows how these people think. You should pay for everything, even the natural stuff like identity.

    Of course, if people are willing to pay, well…

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    People need to stop acting like it’s crazy to pay for the software and servers you use.

    • Eggyhead@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Other people need to stop acting like all software automatically justifies subscription pricing.

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It is crazy to pay these companies who are already run by billionaries and are already owning the largest sites on the internet.

      It’s like people don’t take that into account. Who are we paying? It’s kind of important. I pay smaller companies for email and search because they are not cancers on the internet.

      Do you want internet to be like cable TV with 10 massive internet sites that all require paying and all are owned by the same corporations? If not, stop supporting them.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Do you want internet to be like cable TV with 10 massive internet sites that all require paying and all are owned by the same corporations? If not, stop supporting them.

        I would rather they be like commercial free paid streaming, then the waste of life, advertisement stuffed, hell holes that were cable tv.

        • mrmanager@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah but its never enough money coming in. So your commercial free paid streaming will either get less and less quality content (happened with Netflix etc), or it will go up in price.

          I have become a bit disillusioned with how capitalism works. Not that I have any better system. They all suck because people aspiring to be in power suck.

  • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Elon managing to collect monthly fee for basically a jpeg, is definitely not worst of his business moves.

    • Risk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dunno, it delegitimised the usefulness of Twitter somewhat. Now you can’t be certain that the NASA account that announces an apocalyptic asteroid is real or not.

      • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Long term effects are really of no concern for modern CEOs, that’s not exclusive to Elon that is modus operandi.