Dear Linux community,

In these unpredictable and often challenging times, I feel it’s more important than ever to pause and share heartfelt wishes. Merry Christmas to each and every one of you!

Let this holiday season be a moment of peace, where you can step back, breathe, and find some calm amidst the chaos. Take the opportunity to reconnect, reflect, and perhaps even find inspiration for the year ahead.

May your days be filled with joy, your systems stay secure, and your kernels remain stable. Here’s to a festive season full of positivity and open-source spirit!

Warm wishes,

Your fellow penguin at heart.

P.S.: I had very little time, so the whole thing, was AI accelerated! Please forgive me :-)

      • fool@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        edit: Please be nice to each other! :(

        Lots of downvotes in this reply chain. Not to be a “I don’t wanna be either side” kinda guy but AI isn’t all bad and isn’t all good either. (Greys!)

        Merry Christmasing should be a genuine hug. Even if this was made by a homegrown open-weight open-dataset inference model, it’s nearly 100% low-effort generated – holidays need the human aspect, no? Covering yourself up too much in AI takes away from the humanness with corporate diction, and people need evidence of risktaking genuineness nowadays.

        On the other hand, AI is definitely useful… but elsewhere. It’s not strictly anti-human even if conglomerates are using it that way, which I think you agree on. Wading through HOA using local NLP setups is human. Looking through a Mandarin thread when typical translation sucks, is human.

        But there are domains for its use and there is ethical stuff to work on. This post just doesn’t fit the domain too well, as others agree…

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          eh, i don’t see it as any different than most of the cards in a store, it’s all incredibly low effort and cringy, yet no one seems to give a shit about that.

          • fool@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s an interesting perspective actually

            Maybe it’s because of who’s giving them? If my little cousin gave me an AI Christmas card, I’d be happier than if a stranger gave me one on the street. (Though I’d feel bummed if they didn’t even marker in a single custom sentence)

            i.e. higher standards of creativity/effort from a stranger than from a family member.

            Also the stranger isn’t stuffing a tenner in the card lmao

            • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              i just kinda feel eh about them as a concept, it’s just a piece of paper with an image on it where the sum total involvement from the giver is that they selected the card, and even that is almost never something that took more than 20 seconds.

              It’s a worse version of postcards, which usually have some actually interesting art on them (or a photo) and is relevant to a journey they made.

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          This is irrational and reactionary.

          It’s a take based on an appeal to nature and noble savage fallacies propogated by neolibs and marketing teams making the “organic” play with their products.

          AI is just a tool, it’s misuse by Corpos is something we all agree is bad, but by themselves tools do not make you or anyone else less human, nor do glasses make those of poor sight less human etc.

          How the absurdity of making such a statement on a sub defined by an identity tied to a computer operating system doesn’t make you re-think that claim is beyond me.

          Be better.

          Edit: and no it’s pointless to argue, nobody changes their minds, I’m just posting stuff like this so assholes I would like to have blocked come out and make themselves known as they always do.

          • Kena@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 days ago

            Your 2nd paragraph is just a lie made up in your own head.

            AI isn’t a tool, a brush is. A brush or any other tool lets humans create. an IGA (image generation algorithm) often mislabelled as AI doesn’t let you create instead it TAKES what other humans already had created and shushes it together without regard for any artistic expression, since as a computer program, it’s incapable of art. It’s plagiarism with extra steps.

            Ai as a thing only exists today because it’s in the interest of corporations to replace humans with machines in order to funnel more wealth to the owning class.

            However in a society with class equality AI would be worthless. It cannot “make” anything without someone else already having made that thing first, it’s a waste of time and an erosion to society, a cancer.

            You will never change because simply put, you’re not smart enough to. You’re incapable of understanding how and why you’re wrong because you lack the intelligence, education and desire to grow.