• brb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never understood why anyone would use Brave, the payouts are small, the utility of the crypto is zero, and watching/seeing adverts is a nightmare. I honestly believe that blocking all advertising and sending a small monetary amount to someone providing value is a better way of supporting the people you care about.

    • dan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I use Firefox over Brave simply because I have much more trust that Mozilla won’t suddenly turn into dicks.

      (Also because Firefox is awesome now, and because competition in the browser world is a good thing, but it’s mainly the probably-not-being-dicks thing)

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      the payouts

      wait, what? I was just looking for a search engine that does least tracking and brave was recommended a few times, so I use that, but have never seen any ads or been offered any payout? Am I doing it wrong? (for the record, if they’d offered me payment to watch ads I would have never even installed it in the first place, and will now be removing it as my default on firefox)

      • Sarcastik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I used it for the perceived level of privacy they pretended to offer. Guess I’m switching to Firefox tomorrow.

    • Divus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I made roughly $1200 using Brave at work.

      It is optional to open the ad or not and you do get paid half what you would even if you don’t view the ad. I turned on max number of adds per hour and clicked no most of the time. Took me maybe 10 seconds per hour while I was getting paid to work already. Sure the per ad money got poor over time, but at first it wasn’t so bad at first and I was making a couple bucks per day. Converted that to Bitcoin every month and that has nearly doubled in price. So if I converted to USD right now I’m at $1200 for a grand total of under 9 hours worth of work over 1.5 years. So my hourly pay plus clicking no to the ad I made $166 a hour on average.

      My company’s software stopped working with Brave about half a year ago and now I use Firefox.

  • Makeshift@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every single one of these Brave “scandals” are so irrelevant and meaningless. I was hoping the reddit hive mind wouldn’t be brought over to lemmy, but here we are.

    This article, especially after the update from Brave, seems like a huge nothing-burger. Just another excuse for the Firefox Fanatics crowd to rag on Brave and circlejerk each other about how good Firefox is.

    The article isn’t even about Brave Browser, and it has nothing to do with user data. The website owner is mad that Brave Search is crawling their site and using data in their “Summarizer” feature. I thought Firefox users were supposed to be against the Google internet monopoly, but apparently when it comes to one of the only companies with their own independent and actually decent search engine, they don’t seem to care anymore because of stupid “Firefox good brave bad” browser wars nonsense.

    • _pete_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a web developer the problem I have is there are issues with all the browsers that are available today:

      • Chrome and Edge are owned by big companies and report god-knows-what back to their motherships whilst constantly pushing their own services
      • Firefox uses its own rendering engine so it can have some Firefox specific bugs / differences that might be missed, plus doesn’t have support for some of the extensions that you want
      • Safari doesn’t have windows or extensions support
      • Opera is full of random features and promotional bumpf that I don’t care about and have to turn off
      • Vivaldi is a complicated beast that takes a bunch of work to set up, it also includes a mail client, calendar and feed reader in the browser which I don’t need.
      • DuckDuckGo doesn’t have any extension support at all
      • Arc is really fiddly and doesn’t always behave how I want it to (bookmarks behave like tabs for some reason)
      • Brave pulls things like this and is also full of crypto/wallet type stuff, plus you can’t even change your home page.

      I just want a simple Chromium browser that doesn’t require me to turn a bunch of shit off, is private by default and supports extensions, I don’t think it’s too much to ask!

      • Z4rK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I guess you do get 3-4 questions when you install Vivaldi, like do you want tabs on top, should it import anything, and do you want to use mail and calendar too or just browser.

        But “a complicated beast” to set up? No, it works like any other browser right out of the box. It offers advanced customization if you want to dive into them though.

      • uzay@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Check out ungoogled-chromium. It needs some extra work to get extensions (and probably drm stuff) to work, but has good defaults otherwise.

  • Glitterkoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tried it for a week or two, but since I reinstalled Firefox I really don’t understand why I was judging/hating so much in the past years. Yes, Chrome/ium used to be waaaay faster, but Mozilla just has their shit together most of the time. The Debian of browsers so to speak.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Firefox is GOAT, but I do have Brave installed on my phone specifically for playing YouTube. The Brave browser automatically blocks YouTube ads, allows me to play videos in windowed mode, and allows me to play videos with the screen off.

      I don’t do anything else in Brave, so I’ll probably hang onto it as basically a YouTube app.

        • SSTF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m on an iPhone, which I why I don’t use all the other things Android people suggest.

          Brave has been about the only thing I’ve found that works and is easy for iPhone.

          • AngryJadeRabbit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you’re on apple I’d recommend giving Orion browser a try. It blocks all ads by default, including YouTube. It’s become my default browser on all my devices.

    • Martenz05@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still remember why: Mozilla fired Brendan Eich, the man who would go on to found Brave, for donating to Christian charities in the politically polarised climate of 2016. After Eich went, they also quietly purged any other employees that showed even a hint of conservative sympathies in their internet presence. They then went on to “experiment” with pushing browser ads on users, and while they eventually ended the experiment because of massive user backlash, they still made no apologies and didn’t abandon the idea. Just made a final public response dripping with PR bullshit with a patronising conclusion along the lines of “internet users just aren’t ready for this change yet”.

      • laylawashere44@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Brandon Eich was fired because he was constantly giving money to politicians and groups that were advocating for the banning of same sex marriage. Also funding the campaign of congressman Tom McClintock, a certified piece of shit, Who denies climate change, is against LGBTQ rights, and was among the republicans trying to overturn the 2020 election.

        • jerdle_lemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes. That is political affiliation. You might not share it, but whether same-sex marriage should be legal is absolutely a political question, even if it is now outside the Overton window.

          Personally, I’m not sure I support any form of state marriage, but if it exists, it should include same-sex marriage.

          • SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If your political affiliation implies creating second-class citizens that may be discriminated against due to innate characteristics or harmless behavior, don’t expect me to respect your political identity, to not to discriminate against it, or to give a damn when you find yourself kicked out of places because of it.

        • ram@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So he was fired for his political affiliation.

    • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually use 5 different browsers:

      • Brave for work (need Chromium/Workspace integrations)
      • Mullvad for most things not work
      • LibreWolf simply because Mullvad can’t be set as default
      • Ferdium for convenient containers for sites I am regularly logged into
      • Tor for “sensitive” browsing
      • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ferdium Are you saying Ferdium runs sites in isolated containers so it won’t recognize when I’m logged into another app via cookies?

  • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Their crypto autofill scandal is all one needs to know about this company. If you’re marketing your browser as privacy focused and then pull stunts like that you lose all credibility in my eyes. Forever.

    Firefox or go bust

    • Professorozone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand this crypto auto fill thing. Can you explain it in simple terms? What is it. Why is it bad?

      • Makeshift@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Brave had a thing where if you went to website.com, they would add /ref=brave to the URL so they get a kickback as if you clicked on their referral link.

        Sneaky? Sure. A huge scandal? I don’t think so. No user data was being collected, no privacy was being violated. If I was the company doing the referral system I’d be mad, but as a user, it does not affect me at all.

        Firefox fanatics just need something to point to and say “brave bad firefox good” and that is the worst thing they can find on Brave. It’s all browser wars to them, like iPhone vs Android or Xbox vs Playstation.

        The article in this post also does not affect users in anyway, and has been updated after Brave responded, with most of the worst claims of the article now retracted.

        • Ilgaz@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Stealing referral URLs is lowest kind of spyware/malware tactics. Topmoxie which was another for of advanced java app coming with Limewire did it.

    • Nyaa@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not to mention the interesting bits of info you can find just by looking into the CEO of Brave, Brendan Eich. Plenty of reasons with him alone for someone to avoid the browser and search engine.

      The big one that he likes to keep buried is that he donated money to an anti-gay marriage proposition in California back in 2011, which is what caused some of the pressure for him to step down as Mozilla CEO back in 2014 after being it for a few weeks.

  • Dusty@l.dusty-radio.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    After their crypto crap, this doesn’t surprise me one bit.

    And don’t give me that “You can disable the crypto” the fact is, you shouldn’t have to because it shouldn’t have ever been included in the first place.

    • ultimate_question@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Breaking their users’ trust by appending attribution tags to their URLs should’ve been unforgivable but I still see people pushing their browser online

  • diodorus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using Brave for over a year now and really like it. Nearly all the functionality of Chrome with none of the privacy issues.

    • kostel_thecreed@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You should consider switching to firefox. Brave will be affected by the elimination of Manifest V2, essentially killing privacy on chromium browsers (ubo doesnt work as well, privacy badger is useless, etc). An extremely easy way to switch to firefox without the hassle of configuring it be to private is to download the “Librewolf” fork - comes configured at stock with 99% of the privacy features firefox has.

      • pazukaza@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m very concerned with this change. What incentive will app developers have to ensure their apps run in Firefox if they know Chrome will force users to see ads and be targeted for marketing?

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d avoid Brave based on the founder/CEO’s bigotry alone. This is probably a good reason, too.

      • manapropos@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t see what the CEO’s political views have to do with the quality of the product but you do you

        • Ilgaz@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Core2duo with Nvidia 9400 does very smooth scrolling once you use Wayland. Yes, Linux of course.

            • Ilgaz@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Business issue or hardware? If it is hardware there is always help, e.g. high level kernel devs cared about my HP boot issue or NetBSD.

  • SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can anyone recommend a good alternative that works well under Linux and block ads and trackers well? In particular YouTube ads?

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So glad Puffin killed itself… Why does everything good have to go away?

  • gareins@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why is everyone mixing search engines and browsers here? This is specifically about the search engine and the problems that api of the search engine has with respecting copyright laws. I use their search engine and dont use their browser