I have no idea where that data comes from and that’s exactly the point I’m making. It doesn’t match my personal experience at all.
I have no idea where that data comes from and that’s exactly the point I’m making. It doesn’t match my personal experience at all.
I build the infrastructure that these data centers need to connect to the internet. Our projected power consumption is at least tripling from last year which was itself double the year before, and that’s only the power draw for the fiber optic infrastructure connecting these data centers together. They’re also building a ridiculous amount of computing power in those data centers which is another massive increase in power consumption.
There are some kind-of green efforts in progress to mitigate a bit of the environmental impacts of that increase in demand but most of what I have seen personally is just more draw from the local utility company. I have serious doubts about any data that indicates that tripling power consumption is not a major environmental problem.
True but if we suddenly invent an AI that can replace most jobs I think the rich have more to worry about than we do.
In what way is presenting factually incorrect information as if it’s true not a bad thing?
I don’t think anything of the sort. I found that I didn’t enjoy my time on the platform so I don’t use it anymore. That simple evaluation had more to do with my decision to stop using it than any moral issues I could cite, of which there are many.
Photography is capturing something real in the physical world. Even if the action can be boiled down to “push a button” the photographer needs to have at least some presence where the real event is taking place.
AI art is not a depiction of a real event and requires no physical presence. It’s also not being brought to life by the person taking credit for it. That’s not to say AI generated images can’t be cool or useful but I don’t think they are art. If your definition of art is loose enough to apply to AI generated images then the I think the artist credit should belong to the AI itself or the team that wrote the software, not the person typing in prompts.
What does that even mean? Clearly you and I remember it at minimum. What would you expect to be done differently?
How many beans have you harvested? How many bushels of wheat have you grown? None, damn I guess that means we all have to starve to death.
They’ve been paying teachers shit for way longer than AI has been around. AI can’t do much of anything better than people though.
Why doesn’t anyone call him out on lying about running for a second term? I very vividly remember hearing him say in 2020 that he would not seek reelection and yet here we are.
She’s got DSL. Dinshaw’s suckin lips
My man, chorizo is the best meat there is. It makes every meal better
Are you telling me that simply dumping the contents of a cardboard box into some hot water is not the best way to cook a meal? I’m shocked
Maybe we need to gather all those soloists into a proper orchestra. Then they would really kill it.
That concept is lost on so many people and I don’t understand why. One of the last teams I was on had two weekly meetings. One was 9:00 AM Monday morning and the other was 4:00 PM on Fridays. They were both running through all of our projects and always seemed surprised that the Monday update was the same as the previous Friday update.
Hey, at least he had the right idea. He saw that the delay was due to a lack of skilled workers and tried to fix that problem instead of just talking more about the project. That’s more awareness than most PMs have in my experience.
Tell me you’re still on your parents insurance plan without telling me you’re on your parents insurance plan.
How are you gonna make a list of wish rules that doesn’t include “no infinite wishes”? That’s crazy talk
What kind of resources does this guy have? I don’t think governments can even do proportional and instantaneous DDOS responses. I messed with the wrong dude.