• thecoolowl@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel it’s worse than this. Imagine being the brightest mind in college, have a ton of experience, just to invent new algorithms to get people to click on more ads.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I consider it close to going to school for engineering or design and winding up being the guy in charge of making airplane seats ever smaller and more uncomfortable.

    • Buttons@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, the brightest minds of recent generations are figuring out how to get people to watch ads. We probably could have had fusion energy by now, but instead have ads.

      • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But think of the investors! How can we give them month-after-month gains without forcing ad’s down our user’s throats? /s

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s more about doing what investors think will give them gains, so that they keep investing, don’t quit, and don’t press out the people in charge of the company.

          Dunno why I have this association, but when directors of Apple pressed out Jobs, Apple’s stuff in the following decade was rather cool. I just played with MacOS 9 a bit, with its classical software like Hotline, and it really had a “culture” and an “ecosystem”, and not what Apple’s ads after 2000 tell you, but these seem to have been real.